Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Harmonizing Marriage Law and Intellectual Property Law in Indonesia: The Legal Status and Division of Intellectual Property Rights as Joint Marital Property upon Divorce Gede Aditya Pratama; Elfirda Ade Putri
JURNAL MERCATORIA Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL MERCATORIA JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/mercatoria.v19i1.18169

Abstract

This article examines the normative disharmony between Indonesian Marriage Law and Intellectual Property Law concerning the legal status and division of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) as joint marital property upon divorce. The study focuses on the absence of explicit legal provisions regulating whether intellectual property acquired during marriage constitutes joint property and how its economic value should be distributed following the dissolution of marriage. This regulatory gap creates legal uncertainty, particularly due to the different legal characteristics of moral rights and economic rights within the intellectual property regime. To address this issue, the research employs Gustav Radbruch’s theory of legal certainty, John Rawls’ theory of justice, and John Locke’s theory of property rights. Using normative legal research methods with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study analyses legislation, legal doctrines, and relevant judicial decisions relating to marriage law and intellectual property rights. The findings demonstrate that intellectual property acquired during marriage may be recognised as joint marital property only insofar as it embodies economic rights capable of generating financial benefits. In contrast, moral rights remain inherently attached to the creator or rights holder and therefore cannot be transferred or divided in divorce proceedings. The study further argues for the harmonisation of marriage law and intellectual property law through a legal framework that recognises the economic value of intellectual property as part of the marital estate while preserving the personal nature of moral rights. Such harmonisation is necessary to ensure legal certainty, justice, and legal protection in disputes involving intellectual property as joint marital property.
Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Waris Islam Bagi Masyarakat : Peningkatan Pemahaman, Kepastian, dan Keadilan dalam Pembagian Harta Warisan Elfirda Ade Putri; Rona Apriana Fajarwati; Gede Aditya Pratama
Abdi Bhara Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Abdi Bhara : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/abdibhara.v4i2.4734

Abstract

Program pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini dilaksanakan dalam bentuk penyuluhan hukum mengenai waris Islam kepada masyarakat di wilayah binaan. Kegiatan ini bertujuan meningkatkan pemahaman masyarakat terkait prinsip, asas, dan tata cara pembagian harta waris berdasarkan hukum Islam, termasuk hak dan kedudukan ahli waris, ketentuan bagian masing-masing ahli waris, serta penyelesaian sengketa kewarisan secara damai. Metode yang digunakan berupa ceramah, diskusi, studi kasus, dan konsultasi hukum individual. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan bahwa penyuluhan ini mampu meningkatkan literasi hukum keluarga masyarakat, meminimalisasi konflik waris, dan memberikan kejelasan praktis mengenai penerapan faraidh dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Artikel ini memaparkan latar belakang, teori hukum waris Islam, pelaksanaan kegiatan, evaluasi, dan rekomendasi untuk kegiatan lanjutan.
Settlement of Intellectual Property Disputes through Arbitration in Indonesia Gede Aditya Pratama; Ni Luh Sukma Imagy; Ni Komang Darmiati; I Nyoman Tri Darma Gunawan
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 18 No. 3 (2024): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: DECEMBER 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v18i3.2206

Abstract

The continual advancement of technology and the expanding array of human needs have fuelled significant growth within the trade sector, particularly in intellectual property (IP) domains. This growth is evidenced by a marked increase in intellectual property registrations, which play a pivotal role in the trade sector. The surge in registrations, including trademark, copyright, patent, and industrial design sectors, has correspondingly led to a rise in intellectual property disputes. While these disputes traditionally find resolution within Commercial Courts, alternative mechanisms such as mediation and arbitration have gained prominence. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) oversees a specialized institution for mediation and arbitration, namely the WIPO Mediation and Arbitration Centre. Indonesia similarly hosts its own institution dedicated to resolving intellectual property disputes, the Intellectual Property Arbitration and Mediation Agency (BAM HKI), established in 2011. Arbitration mechanisms prioritize privacy, efficiency, and expediency in resolving intellectual property disputes compared to Commercial Courts. Consequently, the presence of arbitration institution offers a viable alternative dispute resolution mechanism favoured by involved parties.