Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Education Achievement: Journal of Science and Research Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial
Yohanna YR Watofa
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Manokwari, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Algorithmic Constitutional Consciousness Substitution in Artificial Intelligence Regulated Legal Systems and Its Consequences for Human Normative Freedom Yohanna YR Watofa; Nur Asmarani
Education Achievement: Journal of Science and Research Volume 7 Issue 1 March 2026
Publisher : Pusdikra-Publishing.com

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51178/jsr.v7i1.3490

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence in a legal system based on algorithmic regulations poses new problems related to the shift in human constitutional consciousness towards the dominance of automated decision-making that has the potential to limit the normative freedom of individuals. This research aims to analyze the form of substitution of constitutional consciousness by artificial intelligence systems and its implications for human normative freedom in modern legal practice. The research uses normative juridical methods with conceptual approaches, legislative approaches, and legal philosophy approaches. Data were obtained through a literature study of 32 scientific sources, regulations, and international legal documents that were analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation techniques and normative-critical analysis. The results show that artificial intelligence-based legal systems tend to create automated compliance mechanisms that reduce the space for moral reflection, human discretion, and constitutional participation in the legal decision-making process. In addition, the dominance of algorithms has the potential to strengthen the centralization of digital power and produce normative biases that are difficult to transparently monitor. This study concludes that the use of artificial intelligence in the legal system requires strengthening the principles of constitutional safeguard, algorithmic transparency, and human rights-based supervision in order to maintain human normative freedom in a digital legal state.
The Expansion Of Emotional Jurisdiction In Viral Digital Courtrooms and Its Impact On Judicial Legitimacy Yohanna YR Watofa; Atang Suryana; Nurjanah Lahangatubun
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : CV Putra Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58540/jipsi.v5i2.1759

Abstract

The rise of social media has created viral digital courtrooms, namely online spaces where legal cases are discussed, judged, and emotionally interpreted by the public outside formal court procedures. This phenomenon expands emotional jurisdiction, understood as the growing influence of public emotions on the social perception of legal authority, fairness, and judicial credibility. This study analyzes how emotional dynamics in viral digital courtrooms affect judicial legitimacy. Using a socio-legal qualitative approach, the study applies digital discourse analysis to 150 social media posts, online comments, digital news reports, and three viral legal cases. The analysis is supported by in-depth interviews with 12 informants, including legal academics, media observers, and active social media users. The data were examined through thematic analysis and critical discourse analysis. The findings show that viral digital courtrooms intensify public emotional participation and create parallel public judgments that shape perceptions of judge neutrality, procedural fairness, and institutional credibility. The study concludes that judicial legitimacy in the social media era requires more adaptive legal communication and stronger digital governance strategies.
Co-Authors Atang Suryana Nur Asmarani Nurjanah Lahangatubun