Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif JPNM : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin
Wina Febrianti Rukmana Wibisono
Universitas Jember
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekontruksi Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Notaris dalam Era Digital berdasarkan Prinsip Kepastian Hukum Wina Febrianti Rukmana Wibisono; Nuzulia Kumalasari; Moch. Ali
JPNM Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): July : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin (ACCEPTED)
Publisher : SM Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59945/jpnm.v4i3.1317

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi mendorong transformasi dalam praktik kenotariatan melalui konsep cyber notary, yang memunculkan problematika terkait kekuatan pembuktian akta notaris dalam bentuk elektronik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan akta notaris dalam sistem pembuktian hukum perdata, mengidentifikasi disharmonisasi antara Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) dan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE), serta merumuskan rekonstruksi hukum guna menjamin kepastian hukum dalam era digital. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan statute approach, conceptual approach, dan analytical approach, serta teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui studi dokumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa akta notaris tetap memiliki kekuatan pembuktian sempurna sebagai akta otentik, namun digitalisasi menimbulkan pergeseran karakteristik pembuktian yang belum sepenuhnya diakomodasi dalam hukum positif Indonesia. Disharmonisasi antara UUJN dan UU ITE menyebabkan akta elektronik belum diakui secara tegas sebagai akta otentik, sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan rekonstruksi hukum melalui harmonisasi regulasi, penguatan konsep cyber notary, serta pembentukan regulasi khusus yang mampu mengakomodasi akta digital tanpa mengabaikan prinsip kepastian hukum.
PENERAPAN DOKTRIN ULTRA VIRES PADA PERUSAHAAN DI INDONESIA Wina Febrianti Rukmana Wibisono; Fendi Setyawan; Ermanto Fahamsyah
Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif Vol. 17 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37303/magister.v17i1.152

Abstract

Provisions regarding the authority of a corporation are set forth in Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies, which defines the limits of a corporation’s authority in an exhaustive manner; however, the debate regarding the relevance of the ultra vires doctrine in modern legal systems continues, particularly concerning the need to balance legal certainty with business efficiency. An explanation of the concept and scope of the ultra vires doctrine in corporate law—including its legal basis and application—is necessary in Indonesia. The research questions raised are: (1) What is meant by the ultra vires doctrine?; and (2) How are cases related to the ultra vires doctrine resolved? This study employs a normative legal approach using both statutory and case law analyses. The statutory approach utilizes the Company Law (UUPT) and the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), while the case-based approach examines Judgment No. 352/Pdt.G/2021/PNJkt.Pst. The results of the study indicate that (1) the ultra vires doctrine serves as a mechanism to limit a corporation’s authority, ensuring its activities remain consistent with the purposes and objectives outlined in the articles of association, while also providing legal protection for shareholders and third parties engaged in transactions with the corporation; and (2) The case, which was resolved using the ultra vires doctrine, demonstrates that a commissioner of PT. CGI, identified by the initials RAU, can be said to have acted beyond his authority. The judge who examined and decided this case explicitly stated in Decision No. 352/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jkt.Pst that RAU had committed an unlawful act (PMH) under Article 1365 of the Civil Code. However, there is a caveat: exceeding authority or power beyond those limits is considered invalid and not legally binding on the company. Keywords: : Ultra vires doctrine, Limited Liability Company, Limitation of Authority
Co-Authors Ermanto Fahamsyah Fendi Setyawan Moch. Ali Nuzulia Kumalasari