Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Juridical Analysis of The Application of The Principle of Good Corporate Governance in Enterprises Owned By Batu Beriga Village, Central Bangka Regency As A Village-Based Business Entity Maulana; Rahmiati Ranti Pawari
Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ejpp.v6i2.1442

Abstract

Village Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) are strategic instruments in village economic development which are expected to be able to improve community welfare through professional management of local potential. Strengthening the position of BUMDes as a legal entity through Government Regulation Number 11 of 2021 emphasizes the importance of good governance in achieving these goals. However, in practice, there is still a gap between normative goals and empirical implementation, especially related to the effectiveness of the management and implementation of the principles of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) at the village level. This study aims to analyze the implementation of BUMDes Batu Beriga in achieving the goals as stipulated in Government Regulation No. 11 of 2021 and examine the application of GCG principles in its management. The research method used is empirical juridical with a legislative approach and a case approach. Data was obtained through document studies and interviews, then analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical techniques. The results of the study show that formally the Batu Beriga BUMDes have fulfilled the aspect of institutional legality, but substantively it has not been optimal in achieving the goal of increasing Village Original Income and community economic empowerment. The application of GCG principles has also not been running optimally, especially in the aspects of transparency, accountability, and independence which are still influenced by limited managerial capacity and dominance of local actors. The implications of this study confirm that the success of BUMDes is not only determined by legal legitimacy, but also by the quality of good governance. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen institutional capacity, improve the professionalism of managers, and have effective supervision mechanisms to encourage the optimal application of GCG principles to achieve the goals of sustainable village economic development.
Smart Contracts dalam Perspektif Hukum Perjanjian: Meninjau Validitas, Kepastian, dan Tantangan Yuridisnya Devo Ferin Alfarizi; Eko Riyadi; Rahmiati Ranti Pawari
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2026): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v11i1.5524

Abstract

The rapid advancement of blockchain technology has introduced smart contracts as an innovative mechanism for the automated execution of contractual obligations, offering greater efficiency, transparency, and security in digital transactions. However, their implementation in Indonesia continues to face legal challenges concerning contractual validity, legal certainty, and the protection of contracting parties due to the absence of a comprehensive regulatory framework. This study aims to examine the validity of smart contracts from the perspective of Indonesian contract law and to analyze the juridical challenges associated with their implementation under the Indonesian Civil Code and the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that smart contracts may satisfy the legal requirements for a valid contract under Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Nevertheless, their implementation remains hindered by legal uncertainty arising from the lack of specific regulations governing automated execution, electronic evidence, and dispute resolution mechanisms. Therefore, harmonized legal reforms are necessary to ensure legal certainty and provide adequate legal protection for parties engaging in blockchain-based transactions.