Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum
Rizky Akhbar Barus
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Asahan
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pengaturan Liquid Pods Dalam Perspektif Penyalahgunaan Zat Psikotropika di Indonesia (Studi Putusan Nomor 817/Pid.Sus/2025/Pn Kis) Mangaraja Manurung; Rizky Akhbar Barus
JURNAL PENELITIAN SERAMBI HUKUM Vol 19 No 02 (2026): Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum Vol 19 No 02 Tahun 2026 (Februari-Juli)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Batik Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59582/sh.v19i02.1586

Abstract

Technological developments have encouraged innovation in the electronic cigarette industry, including the emergence of liquid pods used in pod-based vaping devices. In practice, liquid pods are not only utilized as a medium for nicotine consumption but are also increasingly misused as a means of consuming psychotropic substances and narcotics. This situation creates legal issues because Indonesian laws have not specifically regulated liquid pods as a medium for the abuse of prohibited substances. This study aims to analyze the legal regulation of liquid pods from the perspective of psychotropic substance abuse in Indonesia and to examine judicial considerations in Decision Number 817/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Kis. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The data were obtained through library research involving primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and were analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that legal regulations concerning liquid pods remain fragmented across several legislative instruments, creating a legal vacuum regarding their misuse. Furthermore, the judicial considerations in the examined decision demonstrate that judges considered both juridical and non-juridical aspects in determining criminal liability.
Co-Authors Mangaraja Manurung