Sri Wahyu Ananingsih
Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

FROM CUSTOMARY GOVERNANCE TO BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION: LEGAL PROSPECTS FOR COMMUNITY-BASED COASTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AS OECMs IN INDONESIA Sri Wahyu Ananingsih; Nur Adhim; Agung Muhammad Siradj
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 55, No 1 (2026): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.55.1.2026.17-46

Abstract

This study examines the legal challenges and necessary measures for recognising community-based coastal resource management practices in Indonesia as Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures (OECMs). As the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework requires the conservation of at least 30 percent of terrestrial, inland water, coastal, and marine areas by 2030, OECMs have become an important instrument for expanding conservation beyond formal protected areas. Indonesia has significant potential to implement OECMs because many coastal and customary communities have long maintained local resource management systems, such as sasi, panglima laot, awig-awig, egek, parimpari, papadak, and other customary practices. These systems reflect community stewardship, ecological sustainability, local wisdom, and social legitimacy. However, their integration into the formal OECM framework remains legally and institutionally complex. Using a non-doctrinal research design with a socio-legal approach, this study draws on in-depth interviews with customary leaders from Wakatobi Island, the Kei Islands, and the Jambi Malay Customary Institution, supported by participant observation and secondary legal and policy analysis. The findings show that the recognition of community-based coastal resource management as OECMs is constrained by the absence of specific OECM regulations, fragmented natural resource governance, overlapping sectoral authority, reduced district and municipal roles in marine management, limited legal recognition of customary law communities, and weak community capacity in documentation, monitoring, and reporting. The study also finds that government policy risks treating OECMs as an administrative tool for meeting global conservation targets rather than as a substantive framework for biodiversity protection and community empowerment. This study argues that effective OECM implementation requires a comprehensive legal framework, harmonised conservation and natural resource regulations, accelerated recognition of customary law communities, meaningful participation based on Free, Prior and Informed Consent, and capacity-building support for local communities. Recognising community-based coastal management practices as OECMs can strengthen biodiversity conservation, provide legal certainty and protection, and affirm communities as legitimate rights holders in sustainable coastal governance.
Marginalization in Indigenous Communities: Limited Recognition and Realization of Rights Based on Transitional Justice Perspective Sukirno Sukirno; Sri Wahyu Ananingsih; Dzaky Mufrih Aimaluddin Siregar
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 4 (2026): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v9i4.14344

Abstract

This study aims to examine the structural barriers to the recognition and realization of indigenous communities’ customary rights in Indonesia and to develop a transitional justice framework for addressing their marginalization. Using a doctrinal legal research method, the study applies statutory and conceptual approaches to analyze constitutional and statutory provisions governing indigenous communities, customary land rights, equality before the law, and transitional justice. The findings demonstrate that constitutional recognition has not translated into effective rights protection because recognition remains conditional and procedurally dependent on state determination. Regulatory fragmentation and sectoral legalism further create inconsistencies between formal legal norms and their implementation, particularly in the protection of customary land and the exercise of indigenous autonomy. These conditions reveal a structural tension between formal equality and substantive equality: treating indigenous communities through uniform legal procedures may reproduce rather than eliminate historical disadvantage. The study’s novelty lies in conceptualizing transitional justice as a normative framework for reconstructing indigenous rights protection beyond conventional recognition-based approaches. It argues that transitional justice requires affirmative and corrective measures that address historical exclusion, recognize customary law as living law, and strengthen indigenous communities’ substantive equality. Accordingly, Indonesia requires an integrated and non-sectoral legal framework that shifts recognition from a conditional administrative process toward an enforceable rights-based mechanism, supported by affirmative protection, meaningful participation, and effective institutional guarantees for the realization of customary rights.