Sukirno Sukirno
Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

SHIFTING LEGAL LANDSCAPES: THE EVOLUTION AND FUTURE OF CUSTOMARY LAND RIGHTS RECOGNITION IN INDONESIA Sukirno Sukirno; Muhammad Fahad Malik
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 54, No 3 (2025): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.54.3.2025.353-371

Abstract

This research explores the legal and political dynamics surrounding the recognition of customary land rights in Indonesia, from the Dutch colonial era to the post-Reformation period. The recognition of customary rights, a concept introduced by van Vollenhoven and later refined by Ter Haar, has evolved through various legal frameworks influenced by shifting political regimes. During the colonial period, Dutch policies acknowledged customary rights, particularly in indigenous areas like Riau and Jambi, though often in a limited and exploitative manner. Post-independence, however, the recognition of customary rights became more complex. The Old Order regime adopted a repressive stance, recognizing customary rights under strict conditions to avoid separatism, while the New Order further diminished these rights in favor of state land control, particularly for corporate interests. The Reform era introduced a somewhat more inclusive yet still restrictive approach to customary land rights, with legal frameworks acknowledging them in principle but often sidelining their practical application in favor of development agendas. This study analyzes these shifting policies using Nonet and Selznick’s framework of repressive, autonomous, and responsive law, concluding that Indonesia’s legal approach to customary rights has been predominantly repressive, with brief periods of responsiveness during certain regulatory changes. Looking forward, the research argues for a shift toward a responsive legal policy that actively involves indigenous communities in the legislative process and provides a clear, inclusive, and sustainable framework for recognizing and protecting customary land rights. Such a shift would be crucial in addressing the historical and ongoing marginalization of indigenous peoples in land-related issues, fostering a more equitable and participatory legal environment.
Marginalization in Indigenous Communities: Limited Recognition and Realization of Rights Based on Transitional Justice Perspective Sukirno Sukirno; Sri Wahyu Ananingsih; Dzaky Mufrih Aimaluddin Siregar
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 4 (2026): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v9i4.14344

Abstract

This study aims to examine the structural barriers to the recognition and realization of indigenous communities’ customary rights in Indonesia and to develop a transitional justice framework for addressing their marginalization. Using a doctrinal legal research method, the study applies statutory and conceptual approaches to analyze constitutional and statutory provisions governing indigenous communities, customary land rights, equality before the law, and transitional justice. The findings demonstrate that constitutional recognition has not translated into effective rights protection because recognition remains conditional and procedurally dependent on state determination. Regulatory fragmentation and sectoral legalism further create inconsistencies between formal legal norms and their implementation, particularly in the protection of customary land and the exercise of indigenous autonomy. These conditions reveal a structural tension between formal equality and substantive equality: treating indigenous communities through uniform legal procedures may reproduce rather than eliminate historical disadvantage. The study’s novelty lies in conceptualizing transitional justice as a normative framework for reconstructing indigenous rights protection beyond conventional recognition-based approaches. It argues that transitional justice requires affirmative and corrective measures that address historical exclusion, recognize customary law as living law, and strengthen indigenous communities’ substantive equality. Accordingly, Indonesia requires an integrated and non-sectoral legal framework that shifts recognition from a conditional administrative process toward an enforceable rights-based mechanism, supported by affirmative protection, meaningful participation, and effective institutional guarantees for the realization of customary rights.