Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ADAPTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE WITHIN A LEGAL PLURALISM FRAMEWORK: A Case Study of The Tengger Indigenous Community in Indonesia Istislam Istislam; Iwan Permadi; Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan; Pitoyo Widhi Atmoko; Cuikitalia Cuikitalia
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 17, No 1 (2026): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v17i1.41228

Abstract

This article examines the gap between the constitutional recognition of Indigenous peoples’ rights and environmental governance practices in Indonesia. The study highlights the asymmetry between national environmental law and customary ecological governance within the Tengger community in the Bromo Tengger Semeru region of East Java. Its objective is to analyze the divergence between national law and customary law and to formulate an integrative model capable of bridging this gap. The study employs a socio-legal approach, combining normative legal analysis with empirical data obtained through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions conducted in Ngadas Village. The findings indicate that governance gaps arise not only from regulatory discrepancies but also from differing institutional perspectives. National law relies on administrative instruments, whereas Tengger customary law is grounded in moral-spiritual norms, collective rituals, and restorative sanctions. The study proposes the concept of Ecological Equilibrium Governance as an integrative framework that incorporates legal pluralism, adaptive governance, and principles of commons-based resource management. Its primary contribution lies in advancing Ecological Equilibrium Governance as a novel model that enriches environmental law scholarship while offering both normative and practical foundations for more inclusive and participatory policymaking. The study’s implications underscore the importance of institutional integration, adaptive co-management, and the strengthened participation of Indigenous communities. Artikel ini mengkaji kesenjangan antara pengakuan konstitusional atas hak-hak masyarakat adat dan praktik tata kelola lingkungan di Indonesia. Studi ini menyoroti asimetri antara hukum lingkungan nasional dan tata kelola ekologi berbasis adat di komunitas Tengger di wilayah Bromo Tengger Semeru, Jawa Timur. Tujuan studi ini adalah untuk menganalisis kesenjangan antara hukum nasional dan hukum adat serta merumuskan model integratif yang mampu menjembatani kesenjangan tersebut. Studi ini menggunakan penelitian sosio-legal, menggabungkan analisis hukum normatif dan data empiris melalui wawancara mendalam dan diskusi kelompok fokus di Desa Ngadas. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa kesenjangan tata kelola tidak hanya disebabkan oleh kesenjangan regulasi tetapi juga oleh perbedaan perspektif kelembagaan, dengan hukum nasional berbasis instrumen administratif, sementara hukum adat Tengger bergantung pada norma moral-spiritual, ritual kolektif, dan sanksi restoratif. Studi ini merekomendasikan konsep Ecological Equilibrium Governance sebagai kerangka kerja integratif yang menggabungkan pluralisme hukum, tata kelola adaptif, dan prinsip pengelolaan sumber daya bersama. Kontribusi utama penelitian ini adalah pengembangan konsep Ecological Equilibrium Governance sebagai model baru yang memperkaya studi hukum lingkungan dan menawarkan landasan normatif dan praktis untuk kebijakan yang lebih inklusif dan partisipatif. Implikasi penelitian menekankan integrasi kelembagaan, pengelolaan bersama yang adaptif, dan penguatan partisipasi masyarakat adat.
Countering Marginalisation: A Collaborative Governance Model for Regu-lating Indigenous Peoples’ Land Rights Based on Local Wisdom Iwan Permadi; Diah Pawestri Maharani; Ashabul Kahfi Ly Aby; Rina Yulianti; Cuikitalia Cuikitalia; Pipit Tunjungsari
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 10 Issue 2, July 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.v10i2.5951

Abstract

Before Indonesian independence, Mandar people in Mamuju Regency used kumah (shifting farming) to obtain land. Customary domains overlap with protected forest areas encompassing 60–70% of the regency, and their land rights are unrecognised. The 2025–2045 Mamuju RPJPD designates ancestral lands, including Rimuku, Tadui, and Bambu, as strategic zones for the region's Nusantara Capital support city, worsening the issue. This paper examines the legal status of customary land in these vital zones, explains how land-rights neglect marginalises the Mandar people, and proposes a collaborative governance approach grounded in Mandar local wisdom to preserve their land rights. The socio-legal approach that combines normative analysis of land regulations with empirical data from Focus Group Discussions and questionnaires with academics, the National Land Agency (BPN), and the Mandar community finds that marginalisation occurs systematically through three mechanisms: stagnant implementation of regional regulations in customary-law communities without a Regent's response. The study recommends a collaborative governance model that integrates Mandar values of sipakatau (mutual humanisation), sipakalebbi (mutual respect), sisallang (deliberation for consensus), and sipakaingge (mutual reminding) with accelerated recognition of customary land rights.