Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Conflict in Management of Passive State Administrative Decision in State Administrative Dispute Wereh, Agustien Cherly; Istislam, Dr
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 5, No 2 (2018): The Role of State in Contemporary Legal Development
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

The governmentâ€™s task to achieve the stateâ€™s objective is provided in the preamble of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In the governance system, societies often encounter tough situation, while administrative law has specially actualised constitutional norms of correlation between the state and its societies. The administrative management in the Law is seen as essential instrument of a democratic state of law, in which decision and/or act is determined by an entity and/or a government official or government apparatus involving executive, judicative, and legislative entities that run governmental functions which are possible to be examined at court. The research problem presented in this research is why there are differences between positive-passive system (stelsel) and negative-passive system regarding the management of state administrative decision. This research employed normative legal research along with prescriptive analysis method. The research result indicates that the emergence of conflict in passive administrative state management is caused by the inaccuracy of legislation in formulating laws.

PERLINDUNGAN KEPENTINGAN NASIONAL DALAM PENANAMAN MODAL Nadya Dara Prasetyo; Istislam Istislam; Siti Hamidah
Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol 5, No 2 (2021): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara holistik urgensi perlindungan hukum terhadap kepentingan nasional dalam penanaman modal di Indonesia, serta menemukan upaya yang tepat. Juga untuk mengetahui kesesuaian pelaksanaan perlindungan kepentingan nasional dalam penanaman modal di Indonesia dengan asas yang sekaligus sebagai sistem perekonomian nasional, yakni demokrasi ekonomi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan historis (historical approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia sebagai negara berkembang membutuhkan dana yang cukup besar untuk melakukan pembangunan nasional, pemenuhan kebutuhan ini salah satunya didapatkan melalui penanaman modal yang dilaksanakan berdasarkan Undаng-Undаng Nomor 25 Tаhun 2007 tentаng Penаnаmаn Modаl. Dimana dalam peraturan tersebut turut mensyaratkan perlindungan atas kepentingan nasional. Namun demikian dalam pengaturannya masih belum maksimal untuk memberikan perlindungan sebagaimana dimaksud, terutama bila ditinjau dari asas demokrasi ekonomi. Asas tersebut memang sudah disinggung dalam pembentukan Undang-Undang Penanaman Modal, tetapi dalam pasal 18 terdapat aturan yang memberi fasilitas khusus tertentu bagi penanam modal berkapasitas besar, dengan kriteria yang kurang dapat melindungi eksistensi UMKM dan koperasi sebagai wujud nyata demokrasi ekonomi dalam kehidupan rakyat. Hal ini tentu berpotensi menimbulkan persaingan yang tidak berimbang antara pemodal besar dan ekonomi rakyat. Berdasarkan kondisi tersebut perlu dilakukan penguatan sistem UMKM serta pengembangan koperasi. Hal ini sesuai dengan cita-cita tolong menolong, sebagaimana amanat konstitusi. Dengan demikian akan terbentuk suatu perlindungan khusus, yang juga menempatkan UMKM dan koperasi pada tingkatan khusus sehingga memiliki peran yang signifikan dalam perekonomian nasional.Kata Kunci: Kepentingan Nasional, Penanaman Modal, Demokrasi Ekonomi This research aims to analyze holistically the urgency of legal protection for the national interest in investment in Indonesia, and to find the right efforts. Also to find out the suitability of the implementation of protection of national interests in investment in Indonesia with the same principle as a national economic system, namely economic democracy. The research method used is the statutory approach (statute approach), conceptual approach and historical approach. The result of the research show that Indonesia as a developing country requires substantial funds to carry out national development, one of which is the fulfillment through investment which is carried out based on Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Modification of Capital. Where the regulation also requires protection of national interests. However, the regulation is still not maximal in providing the protection as intended, especially when it viewed from the economic democracy principles. This principle has indeed been mentioned in the formation of the Investment Law, but in article 18 there are regulations that provide certain special facilities for large capacity investors, with criteria that are not sufficient to protect the existence of UKMKs and cooperatives as a real form of economic democracy in people’s lives. This certainly has the potential to cause unequal competition between large investors and the people’s economy. Based on these conditions, it is necessary to strengthen the UMKM system and develop cooperatives. This is accordance with the ideals of mutual help, as mandated by the constitution. Thus a special protection will be formed, which also places UMKMs and cooperatives at a special level so that they have a significant role in the national economy. Keywords: National Interest, Investment, Economic Democracy.

Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi Ach. Rubaie; Nyoman Nurjaya; Moh. Ridwan; Istislam Istislam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Basic considerations of the Constitutional Court made ultra petita verdict was:(a) philosophical reasons in order to enforce substantive justice and constitutional justice as embodied in the Constitution NRI 1945, (b) theoretical grounds related to the authority of the judge to explore, discover and follow the legal values that live in the community, if the law does not exist or insufficient legal anymore (outdated), and (c) juridical reasons relating to the provision of Article 24 paragraph (1) NRI 1945 Constitution and Article 45 paragraph (1) of Law no. 24 year 2003 on the Constitutional Court, that Court as organizers aim to enforce the judicial justice according to law and the evidence and the judge's conviction. The verdict the Constitutional Court which is ultra petita basically acceptable, all associated to the subject of the request and based on considerations which can be accounted for philosophical (ie, contains the values of justice, morality, ethics, religion, principle, doctrine). The authority to make ultra petita verdict for the Constitutional Court can only be given if there is vagueness of legal norms (vague normen) through the method of interpretation of the law, or if a legal vacuum (rechts-vacuum) through the creation of legal methods (rechtschepping). But considering the legal interpretation and legal formation are highly subjective, hence in order to prevent abuse of power, the Constitutional Court issued a verdict ultra petita, should be limited by the principles of a democratic state of law, the principles of fair trial and impartial, and general principles of good governance.

Kewenangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Mengadili Atas Otentisitas Akta Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Di Luar Wilayah Kerja Indriana Prima Puspita Sari; Istislam Istislam; Nurini Aprilianda
Jurnal ADIL Vol 8, No 1 (2017): ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, Juli 2017
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Universitas YARSI

NotarisÂ adalahÂ pejabatÂ umumÂ yangÂ berwenangÂ untukÂ membuatÂ aktaÂ otentikÂ yang telahÂ ditentukanÂ olehÂ undang-undang.Â UntukÂ menjalankanÂ jabatannyaÂ dalam membuat akta ditempat kedudukan dan wilayah kerjanya, dengan pengawasan dan pembinaanÂ olehÂ MajelisÂ PengawasÂ Notaris.Â AkanÂ tetapiÂ padaÂ faktanya,Â dalam menjalankan jabatannya masih saja ada Notaris yang secara sengaja maupun tidak sengajaÂ masihÂ menjalankanÂ jabatannyaÂ diluarÂ tempatÂ kedudukanÂ danÂ wilayah kerjanya itu, sehingga atas hal tersebut menimbulkan sengketa atas otentisitas akta Notaris. Selain itu, pada penyelesaiannya hal ini juga menimbulkan gejala konflik mengenaiÂ kewenanganÂ penyelesaianÂ sengketaÂ antaraÂ lembagaÂ peradilanÂ umum denganÂ MajelisÂ PengawasÂ NotarisÂ atasÂ otentisitasÂ aktaÂ yangÂ dibuatÂ olehÂ Notaris. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode normatif dengan studi kasus dan menganalisa kewenanganÂ penyelesaianÂ sengketaÂ mengadiliÂ atasÂ otentisitasÂ aktaÂ yangÂ dibuat oleh Notaris di luar wilayah kerja, dengan tujuan agar terciptanya suatu kepastian dalam penegakan hukum di IndonesiaÂ yang sesuai menurut peraturan perundang- undangan yang berlaku.

Penerаpаn аsаs-аsаs umum pemerintаhаn yаng bаik dаlаm penyelesаiаn sengketа tanah hak milik Dita Ernanda; Istislam Istislam; Yuliati Yuliati
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 12, No 1 (2021): April 2021
Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v12i1.4226

This paper aims to understand the General Principles of Good Governance in the principles used as a reference in the use of authority for Government Officials in issuing decisions and / or actions in government administration. The research method is the juridical empirical method because it examines the implementation of AUPB as one of the bases for testing the validity of government actions, namely the settlement of disputes / conflicts over property rights. Based on the results of the discussion, it is found that government officials or government organizations are obliged to apply this to create justice and welfare in society. Of course this should also be implemented in dispute resolution, particularly land dispute resolution. This research focuses on the application of AUPB in the settlement of land disputes at the Malang City Land Office, because there are still many polemics in its resolution. Fаktor law sebаgаi penghаmbаt dаri terms of legal structure аdаlаh terhаdаp object yаng telаh published suаtu hаk аtаs tаnаh dаn the object sedаng menjаdi object perkаrа in pengаdilаn dаn BPN menjаdi pihаk dаlаm perkаrа, terkаit CTF SKP yаng telаh dilаkukаn pengentriаn dаtа mаkа beberаpа pelаyаnаn pendаftаrаn tаnаh аkаn locked / blocked by the system. Non-legal factors as an obstacle to dispute settlement are the parties who are difficult to do to work together in the process of dispute resolution but never lead to zinc resolution.How to cite item: Ernanda, D., Istislam, I., Yuliati, Y. (2021). Penerаpаn аsаs-аsаs umum pemerintаhаn yаng bаik dаlаm penyelesаiаn sengketа tanah hak milik. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(1), 32-40. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i1.4226

Regional Head’s Authority In Determining Mutation Of Government Employees Fahmi Kamuli; Tunggul Anshari; Istislam Istislam
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 3 NO. 1 JANUARY 2021
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

This research is aimed to analyzing and understanding the actions of the Head of Boalemo Regency in mutate the Civil Servant based on the mutation policy and also to analyze the filling positions in the implementation of the mutation of Civil Servants in Boalemo Regency. The method used in this research is Empirical Juridical Method. The results of the research were found that mutations of Civil Servant are enhancement over the years in Boalemo Regency. Injustice in determining mutations is marked by work placements that are not compatible with Civil Servants’ educational background. There is a political interest in the Government of Boalemo Regency which caused injustice in the mutation of the Civil Servants.

Menyelami Asas Ultra Petita Dalam Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Janwar Hippy; Sudarsono Sudarsono; Istislam Istislam
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 2 NO. 1 JANUARY 2020
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Putusan DKPP Nomor 88/DKPP-PKE-IV/2015 memutus lebih dari yang diminta oleh pengadu (menerapkan asas ultra petita). Padahal, DKPP merupakan salah satu organ tata usaha negara yang berfungsi sebagai lembaga peradilan etik, bukan lembaga peradilan hukum. Penulis tertarik untuk melakukan kajian mengenai penggunaan asas ultra petita dalam putusan DKPP. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach), pendekatan kasus (case approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conseptual approach). Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah 1) Penggunaan asas ultra petita oleh DKPP dalam memutus pelanggaran kode etik oleh penyelenggara Pemilu (KPU dan Bawaslu) tidak bertentangan dengan hukum positif yang berlaku, karena telah ditentukan batasan kewenangan putusan DKPP dalam UU Pemilu.. 2) Terdapat dua akibat hukum putusan DKPP yang menerapkan asas ultra petita antara lain KTUN penyelenggara Pemilu sah dan mengikat, dan cacat hukum (batal dan tidak sah).

Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi Ach. Rubaie; Nyoman Nurjaya; Moh. Ridwan; Istislam Istislam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Basic considerations of the Constitutional Court made ultra petita verdict was:(a) philosophical reasons in order to enforce substantive justice and constitutional justice as embodied in the Constitution NRI 1945, (b) theoretical grounds related to the authority of the judge to explore, discover and follow the legal values that live in the community, if the law does not exist or insufficient legal anymore (outdated), and (c) juridical reasons relating to the provision of Article 24 paragraph (1) NRI 1945 Constitution and Article 45 paragraph (1) of Law no. 24 year 2003 on the Constitutional Court, that Court as organizers aim to enforce the judicial justice according to law and the evidence and the judge's conviction. The verdict the Constitutional Court which is ultra petita basically acceptable, all associated to the subject of the request and based on considerations which can be accounted for philosophical (ie, contains the values of justice, morality, ethics, religion, principle, doctrine). The authority to make ultra petita verdict for the Constitutional Court can only be given if there is vagueness of legal norms (vague normen) through the method of interpretation of the law, or if a legal vacuum (rechts-vacuum) through the creation of legal methods (rechtschepping). But considering the legal interpretation and legal formation are highly subjective, hence in order to prevent abuse of power, the Constitutional Court issued a verdict ultra petita, should be limited by the principles of a democratic state of law, the principles of fair trial and impartial, and general principles of good governance.

LEGAL PROTECTION FOR APPEARERS WHEN THE NOTARY'S EXISTENCE IS UNKNOWN (AFWEZEGHEID) Yusti Merilistia; Istislam; Yenni Eta Widyanti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 3 No. 6 (2023): November
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v3i6.1146

This research examines the legal protection of clients when the notary's whereabouts are unknown (afwezigheid). describe and analyze the certainty of legal protection for appearers who are harmed by a notary whose whereabouts are unknown afwezigheid and to analyze and formulate forms of legal protection that can guarantee legal certainty for appearers who are harmed by a notary whose whereabouts are unknown afwezigheid.This research is a normative juridical research through literature study using statutory approach (statute approach) and conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The main issues were analyzed using primary legal materials includingProvisions of Article 463 in conjunction with Article 467 of the Civil Code, provisions of Article 15, Article 16, Article 17, Article 62, Article 63 Article 67, Article 69 and Article 70 of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public juncto Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary, Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 15 of 2020 concerning Procedures for Examining the Supervisory Board of Notaries and Notary Code of Ethics. Legal materials were analyzed based on prescriptive analysis and grammatical and systematic interpretation techniques. Based on the research results it is known thatLegal protection for appearers who are harmed by a notary whose whereabouts are unknown afwezigheid based on the analysis of UUJN Amendment) is weak, because basically (“UUJN”) juncto (“UUJN”) Amendment has accommodated arrangements regarding the presence of a notary in the exercise of his office.

BLOCKING ACCESS POLICY OF UNREGISTERED PRIVATE ELECTRONIC SYSTEM OPERATORS IN HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE Rinalvin Achmad Wiryawan; Istislam; Dhia Al Uyun
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): January
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v4i1.1452

The decision of the Panel of Judges in the State Administrative Court Decision at the Jakarta State Administrative Court Number 424/G/TF/2022/PTUN.JKT, contradicts with many human rights law, especially related to the right to communicate and obtain information and economic rights. The right to communicate and to access and obtain information is a right guaranteed and recognized by the Indonesian Constitution as stipulated in Article 28F of the 1945 Constitution, and regulated in Articles 14 of the Human Rights Act. In addition, the right to communicate and obtain information is also regulated internationally in the provisions of Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which has been ratified in the provisions of the Law Number 12 of 2005 concerning the Ratification of the ICCPR (KIHSP Law). The right to economy and employment is a human right guaranteed in the Indonesian constitution, as stipulated in Article Article 27 paragraph (2) UUD NRI Tahun 1945, and regulated internationally in the provisions of Article 1 Number 2, Article 5 paragraph (2), and Article 6 of International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) that has been ratified in the provisions of Law Number 11 of 2005 concerning the Ratification of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (KIHESB Law).

Title

Found 10 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 10 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 10 Documents
Search