Fahmi Sidiq
Master of sains program, Faculty of Pharmacy, university Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kampung Gong Badak, 21300, Terengganu

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Applying Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Employee Turnover Intention: A Comparative Model Analysis Siti Hadiaty Yuningsih; Fahmi Sidiq; Yasir Salih
International Journal of Quantitative Research and Modeling Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): International Journal of Quantitative Research and Modeling (IJQRM)
Publisher : Research Collaboration Community (RCC)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46336/ijqrm.v7i2.1344

Abstract

Employee turnover represents a major challenge for organizations because it increases recruitment and training costs, disrupts operational continuity, and reduces organizational performance. Although machine learning has been widely applied to employee attrition prediction, most studies focus on comparing algorithms using the complete feature set, with limited attention to the predictive contribution of different employee information domains. This study aims to identify the most informative attribute domains for turnover prediction, compare the performance of ANN, RF, and SVM, and evaluate whether reduced-domain models can achieve performance comparable to full-feature models. The study utilized the IBM HR Analytics Employee Attrition dataset containing 1,470 employee records. Thirty predictive attributes were organized into six conceptual domains: Personal Information, Job Characteristics, Compensation, Work Environment, Career Development, and Relationship & Supervision. Twelve domain-based model configurations were developed and evaluated using ANN, RF, and SVM. Model development employed SMOTE to address class imbalance and repeated 10-fold cross-validation, while final evaluation was conducted on an independent holdout validation dataset. The results show that multi-domain models consistently outperform single-domain configurations. Compensation and Career Development emerged as the strongest standalone domains, while Work Environment was present in all top-performing models. The highest validation accuracy was achieved by M0-SVM (84.01%), whereas M11-SVM achieved comparable performance (82.65%) using only 16 attributes. M11-ANN produced the highest ROC AUC (0.782), indicating superior discriminative capability. Feature importance analysis identified OverTime, MonthlyIncome, Age, TotalWorkingYears, and YearsAtCompany as the most influential predictors. These findings demonstrate that domain composition is as important as algorithm selection in employee turnover prediction and highlight the importance of work environment, compensation, and career development factors in supporting data-driven employee retention strategies.
Quantitative Risk Management Modeling for Automotive Component Supply Chains Using the FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) Method Muhammad Rizky Aulia; Fahmi Sidiq
International Journal of Quantitative Research and Modeling Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): International Journal of Quantitative Research and Modeling (IJQRM)
Publisher : Research Collaboration Community (RCC)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46336/ijqrm.v7i3.1448

Abstract

Automotive component supply chains are exposed to interconnected disruptions arising from supplier dependence, demand variability, production coordination, logistics, information exchange, and external economic conditions. This study develops a quantitative risk-prioritization framework using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to identify critical failure modes and evaluate the robustness of their priorities within an automotive component supply chain. The analysis integrates supply-chain process mapping, systematic failure-mode identification, expert validation, multi-expert scoring, Risk Priority Number (RPN) calculation, domain-level aggregation, and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis. Eight cross-functional experts assessed 27 failure modes across nine supply-chain domains using standardized Severity, Occurrence, and Detection scales. After data screening, 212 valid ratings were retained. The aggregated results produced a mean RPN of 144.24, with Severity showing the highest mean score (6.60), followed by Detection (5.35) and Occurrence (4.20). Demand fluctuation recorded the highest RPN (233.38), followed by delayed supplier delivery (230.73) and nonconforming supplier components (226.82). Supplier risk also exhibited the highest domain-level mean RPN (201.45). Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis demonstrated strong ranking stability, with a mean Spearman correlation of 0.961 across 1,000 iterations; the ten baseline top-ranked failure modes all exceeded the 0.70 robustness threshold. The findings establish a supported mitigation agenda spanning demand forecasting, supplier diversification, quality assurance, preventive maintenance, financial hedging, logistics flexibility, information-system integration, and procurement planning. The framework strengthens proactive risk governance by linking failure-mode prioritization with robustness assessment and targeted intervention.