Noor Idha Handajani
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Evaluation of dextrose prolotherapy versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy for pain relief and functional improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis I Made Yoga Prabawa; Noor Idha Handajani; Abdul Jabbar Al Hayyan; Lydia Arfianti; Atika
Physical Therapy Journal of Indonesia Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): January-June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Udayana dan Diaspora Taipei Medical University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51559/ptji.v7i1.410

Abstract

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) remains a leading degenerative joint disease and a primary driver of chronic pain and disability among older adults. This condition is clinically defined by progressive cartilage degradation, joint stiffness, and a significant loss of functional mobility. Because standard conservative treatments often fail to provide adequate relief, there has been growing interest in regenerative approaches such as extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and dextrose prolotherapy (DP). While their clinical use is increasing, direct comparative evidence regarding their relative effectiveness is still largely missing from some studies. This study aimed to evaluate the differences between ESWT and DP affect patients with knee OA in terms of functional improvement as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and pain reduction as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Methods: This quasi-experimental study employed a pre-test–post-test randomised group design. Twenty patients with grade II–III knee OA who were not improving with traditional therapy were recruited and randomly assigned to two groups: ESWT (n=11) and DP (n=9). The interventions lasted for six weeks. Both before and after the intervention, the WOMAC and the VAS for pain were assessed as outcome measures. A statistical study was conducted to find differences both within and between groups. Results: Both the ESWT and DP groups had statistically significant improvements in all metrics, including pain (VAS), WOMAC pain, stiffness, disability, and total scores (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups for any of the evaluated outcomes (p>0.05). Conclusion: ESWT and DP were equally effective in reducing pain and improving functional outcomes in patients with knee OA. These findings indicate their role as a successful alternative therapy for people who don't receive enough relief from conventional medical therapies. Additional randomized controlled research are required to confirm these conclusions.
Comparing the effects of dextrose prolotherapy and extracorporeal shockwave therapy on dynamic balance in knee osteoarthritis patients Fahmi Aulia Rizqi; Noor Idha Handajani; Yudith Dian Prawitri; Lydia Arfianti; Abdul Jabbar Al Hayyan; Atika Atika
Physical Therapy Journal of Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): January-June 2025
Publisher : Universitas Udayana dan Diaspora Taipei Medical University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51559/ptji.v6i1.251

Abstract

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is an age-related degenerative disease affecting the subchondral tissue of articular and bone cartilage, leading to biomechanical changes that cause pain, stiffness, and balance impairment, which increases fall risk and its severe consequences, including fractures, joint dislocations, loss of independence, and even death. Dynamic balance function can be assessed using the four square step test (FSST), a recommended functional test for knee OA patients. Knee OA management continues to develop, introducing regenerative therapies such as dextrose prolotherapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT). Therefore, this study aims to analyze the effects of dextrose prolotherapy and ESWT on dynamic balance outcomes. Methods: Twenty-one subjects with unilateral knee osteoarthritis (grade II-III) were randomly assigned to either the dextrose prolotherapy or ESWT therapy group. The dextrose prolotherapy group received three injections, with a 3-week interval between each. The ESWT group underwent six sessions of therapy spaced one week apart. FSST was assessed before and after the intervention. Results: Significant improvements in dynamic balance function, as measured by the FSST (p < 0.05), were observed within each group when comparing pre-and post-intervention results. However, no significant difference (p > 0.05) was found in FSST outcomes between the two groups. No severe adverse effects were reported in patients from either group. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a positive impact of dextrose prolotherapy and ESWT therapy on the dynamic balance function of patients with knee OA. Both interventions were equally effective in improving dynamic balance function.