Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum
Rafasya Nadia Ghifari
Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Implikasi Yuridis Perda DKI Jakarta Nomor 7 Tahun 2025 tentang Kawasan Tanpa Rokok terhadap Urgensi Perlindungan UMKM dan Pelanggaran Hak Konstitusional Berusaha Aslan Noor; Misbahul Anam; Rafasya Nadia Ghifari; Falizha Dwi Saputri; Aldira Anggia Putri
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 4 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i4.7874

Abstract

Jakarta Special Capital Region Regulation No. 7 of 2025 on Smoke-Free Zones (SFZs) restricts the sale and display of tobacco products, which has the potential to violate the constitutional rights of MSMEs to work and a decent livelihood (Article 27, Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution). This study analyzes the conflict between the SFZ policy and the right to conduct business, legal protections for affected SMEs, and the role of local governments in balancing public health and social justice. The results indicate that while the regulation meets the principles of clarity and transparency, it conflicts with the hierarchy of regulations by disregarding the economic realities of SMEs. Supporting policies, such as SME capacity-building and the provision of proportionate smoking areas, are necessary. Abstrak Peraturan Daerah DKI Jakarta Nomor 7 Tahun 2025 tentang Kawasan Tanpa Rokok (KTR) membatasi penjualan dan display produk rokok, yang berpotensi melanggar hak konstitusional UMKM atas pekerjaan dan penghidupan layak (Pasal 27 Ayat (2) UUD 1945). Penelitian ini menganalisis konflik kebijakan KTR dengan hak berusaha, perlindungan hukum bagi UMKM terdampak, serta peran pemerintah daerah dalam menyeimbangkan kesehatan publik dan keadilan sosial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Perda telah memenuhi asas kejelasan dan keterbukaan, terdapat ketidaksesuaian dengan hierarki peraturan karena mengabaikan realitas ekonomi UMKM. Diperlukan kebijakan pendamping seperti pembinaan UMKM dan penyediaan ruang merokok yang proporsional.
Batas Penggunaan Kekayaan Yayasan untuk Kegiatan Usaha dalam Perspektif Hukum Yayasan Fadhil Putra Nurizal; Marsya Meytasari Azzahra; Naeshyla Hanuna Wasito; Rafasya Nadia Ghifari; I Ketut Astawa
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Maret : JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v5i1.7158

Abstract

The assets of a foundation are primarily intended to achieve the foundation’s purposes and objectives; therefore, their use in business activities requires clear legal limitations. This study aims to analyze the limitations on the use of foundation assets for business activities from the perspective of foundation law. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. The legal materials consist of legislation and legal literature relating to foundations and the management of their assets. The results of the study indicate that a foundation may conduct business activities through the establishment of a business entity and/or participation in a business entity, provided that such activities are related to the purposes and objectives of the foundation. However, such authority is subject to legal limitations to prevent the misuse of foundation assets in a manner inconsistent with the foundation’s purposes. These limitations include restricting the participation of foundation assets to a maximum of 25% of the foundation’s total assets, requiring a connection between the business activities and the foundation’s purposes and objectives, restricting concurrent positions between foundation organs and business entity organs, and prohibiting the distribution of business proceeds to foundation organs. Accordingly, the use of foundation assets for business activities does not constitute an unrestricted freedom but must be carried out within the framework of achieving the foundation’s purposes while complying with applicable legal provisions. These limitations also serve as an instrument to ensure that foundation assets continue to be used in accordance with the functions and purposes for which the foundation was established.
Co-Authors Aldira Anggia Putri Aslan Noor Fadhil Putra Nurizal Falizha Dwi Saputri I ketut astawa Marsya Meytasari Azzahra Misbahul Anam Naeshyla Hanuna Wasito