Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Komputer Teknologi Informasi Sistem Komputer (JUKTISI)
Khabib Tri Anggara Anggara
Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Engineering

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Naïve Bayes dan Random Forest untuk Klasifikasi Sentimen Ulasan Produk Amazon Fire HD 7 Khabib Tri Anggara Anggara; Rahmad Syukur Gea; Hendra S upendar; Riza Fahlapi
Jurnal Komputer Teknologi Informasi Sistem Komputer (JUKTISI) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): September 2026
Publisher : LKP KARYA PRIMA KURSUS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62712/juktisi.v5i2.1315

Abstract

Product reviews on e-commerce platforms contain valuable consumer opinions that are important for both prospective buyers and brand managers. However, the large volume of reviews makes manual analysis difficult. This study compares the performance of the Naïve Bayes and Random Forest algorithms in classifying the sentiment of Amazon Fire HD 7 product reviews into three categories: positive, neutral, and negative. A total of 30,846 English-language reviews were processed through text preprocessing and TF-IDF feature weighting, then split using a stratified 80:20 ratio. Both models were evaluated using accuracy, as well as macro-averaged precision, recall, and F1-score. The results indicate metric-dependent performance differences: Random Forest achieved higher accuracy (0.856 vs. 0.770), whereas Naïve Bayes outperformed Random Forest in terms of macro F1-score (0.481 vs. 0.447), which is the primary evaluation metric for imbalanced datasets. Random Forest tended to predict the majority class (positive), resulting in weaker performance on the neutral and negative classes, while Naïve Bayes produced more balanced predictions across all classes. These findings demonstrate that accuracy can be misleading when evaluating imbalanced datasets and that the macro F1-score provides a more representative measure for assessing multiclass sentiment classification performance.
Co-Authors Hendra S upendar Rahmad Syukur Gea RIZA FAHLAPI