M. Fariz Afif Hasibuan
Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, Universitas Satya Terra Bhinneka, Medan

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Rice farmers and climate change: a vulnerability study and adaptation strategy in Deli Serdang Regency Herlyna Novasari Siahaan; Mia Wananda Varwasih; Hendris Syah Putra; M. Fariz Afif Hasibuan
Journal of Agricultural Socio-Economics (JASE) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Agricultural Socio-Economics (JASE)
Publisher : University of Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/jase.v7i1.25096

Abstract

Rice is a strategic commodity for national food security; however, its production is increasingly threatened by climate change, including shifting rainfall patterns, rising temperatures, and more frequent extreme weather events that create yield uncertainty and reduce farmer welfare. This study aims to analyze the influence of economic, social, and environmental factors on livelihood sustainability and the adaptive capacity of rice farmers in Deli Serdang Regency. The main contribution of this research lies in explicitly modeling livelihood sustainability as a mediating variable linking climate change impacts to farmers’ adaptive capacity within an integrated SEM-PLS framework. Unlike previous studies that mainly focus on direct effects, this study examines both direct and indirect relationships, providing a clearer understanding of how environmental pressures translate into adaptive outcomes at the household level. A quantitative approach was employed using data from 95 rice-farming households. The SEM-PLS results indicate that environmental factors significantly affect livelihood sustainability and adaptive capacity. Livelihood sustainability also significantly enhances adaptive capacity, confirming its role as a key mediating variable. In contrast, economic and social factors do not show significant effects. The model demonstrates moderate explanatory power (R² = 0.389). These findings highlight that adaptation is not solely a direct response to environmental stressors but is strongly mediated by livelihood sustainability, emphasizing the importance of strengthening livelihoods as a central strategy in climate change adaptation policies.
Social sustainability of smallholder coffee partnerships and SDG linkages in North Sumatra Province Indah Kartika Sandra; Hendris Syah Putra; M. Fariz Afif Hasibuan
Journal of Agricultural Socio-Economics (JASE) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Agricultural Socio-Economics (JASE)
Publisher : University of Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/jase.v7i1.25103

Abstract

This study evaluates the social sustainability of a smallholder coffee partnership in Gung Pinto Village, where farmers still face production and quality constraints, limited market information, and price fluctuations. While previous research predominantly focuses on the economic outcomes of coffee supply chains, the social life cycle impact of informal smallholder partnerships remains under-investigated. The novelty of this study lies in its application of SLCIA Type I to evaluate localized social sustainability and its precise integration with regional SDG indicators in North Sumatra.  The case study was conducted in November 2025; the location was selected purposively, and 30 farmer households were selected using simple random sampling. The assessment applied the UNEP-SETAC Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA) framework and Social Life Cycle Impact Assessment (SLCIA) type I with performance reference points on five indicators: fair trade relations, wealth distribution, supplier relations, fulfillment of basic needs, and access to services and inputs. The results indicate that the social performance of the partnership is generally positive with an average score of 3.5, indicating compliance and, in some aspects, performance exceeding minimum standards. Access to services and inputs performed best (score 5), followed by wealth distribution (4.1), supplier relationships (3.7), and basic needs fulfillment (3.7), reflecting input and service support, increased income, improved access to basic services, and strengthened technical capacity through extension activities. Conversely, fair trade relationships scored low (1.0) due to the lack of written contracts, which can weaken the clarity of long-term rights and obligations. Overall, the partnership advances SDGs 1, 2, 6, 8, and 12 through improved income, access to basic services, and more sustainable production, while adaptive written agreements are needed to strengthen fairness and social resilience.