Manswab Mahsen Abdulrahman
University in Uganda

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Role of Arbitration in Resolving Industrial Relations Disputes in Indonesia: A Case Study of Employment Manswab Mahsen Abdulrahman; Nikmah Dalimunthe; Aryanti Khairunnisa Br Tarigan; Ridho Rama Ardana Sinaga
Jurnal Sahabat ISNU SU Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): ISNU Sahabat Mei 2024
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jsisnu.v1i3.504

Abstract

In employment relationships, industrial relations conflicts are common and require efficient, fair, and effective resolution mechanisms. This study examines how arbitration institutions function in resolving industrial relations disputes and evaluates their advantages, disadvantages, and shortcomings within the Indonesian legal system. This study examines arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution method outside the Industrial Relations Court using a normative juridical approach based on laws, legal literature, and scientific studies. The results indicate that arbitration plays a significant role in encouraging conflict resolution through deliberation and agreement between disputing parties. Arbitration offers several advantages compared to litigation, such as faster dispute resolution, lower costs, confidentiality, procedural flexibility, and greater legal certainty through final and binding decisions. By encouraging agreed solutions, arbitration can also help maintain healthy relationships between employers and employees. However, the mechanism has disadvantages. These include limited opportunities for appeal, the possibility of arbitrator bias, ambiguity, and dependence on the arbitrator's ability and honesty. Despite these shortcomings, arbitration remains a useful means of resolving industrial relations conflicts when conducted with professionalism, impartiality, and good faith from all parties involved. Therefore, arbitration helps build a fair, stable, and productive industrial relations system.
Contemporary Islamic Jurisprudence Study On Interfaith Marriage: A Review Of Modern Schools Of Thought And Scholars Manswab Mahsen Abdulrahman; Dinda Suciana Rambe; Raja Albar Pandapotan Simatupang
AT-TAFAHUM: Journal of Law Vol 5, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana UIN Sumatera Utara Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/attafahum.v5i1.29128

Abstract

Interfaith marriage has become an increasingly significant issue in contemporary Islamic jurisprudence due to the growing interaction among people of different religious backgrounds in the era of globalization. While Islamic teachings provide legal guidance on marriage, contemporary scholars have sought to reinterpret classical rulings by considering the objectives of Islamic law (maqasid al-shariah) and the realities of modern pluralistic societies. This study aims to analyze the concept of interfaith marriage from the perspective of contemporary Islamic jurisprudence, examine the views of the four major Sunni schools of law and contemporary Muslim scholars, and explore its relevance within the Indonesian legal system. The research employs a qualitative approach using normative juridical and library research methods. Primary data consist of the Qur'an, Hadith, and classical as well as contemporary Islamic legal literature, while secondary data are obtained from scientific journals, books, and Indonesian marriage regulations. The collected data were analyzed descriptively and analytically to identify similarities, differences, and contemporary legal implications. The findings reveal that the four Sunni schools generally prohibit Muslim women from marrying non-Muslim men, while differing opinions exist regarding Muslim men marrying women from the People of the Book (Ahl al-Kitab). Contemporary scholars such as Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Quraish Shihab acknowledge the textual permissibility of such marriages but emphasize that they should be assessed based on public interest, family harmony, and the religious upbringing of children. In Indonesia, interfaith marriages are not legally recognized under Law Number 1 of 1974 because marriage validity depends on compliance with the respective religious laws of the parties involved. The study concludes that although contemporary Islamic jurisprudence provides room for contextual interpretation, the principles of preserving faith, family stability, and social welfare remain the primary considerations in determining the legal status of interfaith marriage.