p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Private Law
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Keabsahan Cessie Atas Sebagian Piutang Sebagai Dasar Permohonan Pailit I Made Arnandhita Suyatra; Salim Hs; Diman Ade Mulada
Private Law Vol 6 No 2 (2026): Private Law Universitas Mataram
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/wtx4eq79

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji pengaturan hukum cessie atas sebagian piutang serta keabsahannya sebagai dasar permohonan pailit menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004.  Tujuannya adalah menganalisis dasar hukum pengalihan sebagian piutang dan kedudukan kreditor penerima cessie dalam kepailitan. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual.   Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa cessie atas sebagian piutang sah secara hukum perdata berdasarkan Pasal 613 KUHPerdata dan diperkuat oleh Pasal 1694 KUHPerdata yang mengkualifikasikan piutang sebagai benda yang dapat dibagi, namun belum diatur secara eksplisit dalam rezim kepailitan sehingga menimbulkan kekaburan norma, ketidakpastian hukum, dan potensi penyalahgunaan. Kesimpulannya, meskipun sah secara perdata, penggunaan cessie sebagian sebagai dasar permohonan pailit masih problematis sehingga memerlukan pengaturan yang lebih tegas untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dan keadilan.  
Legal Challenges of Smart Contract Integration in Indonesian Notarial Practice Eni Arfianti; Salim HS; Ari Rahmad Hakim Budiawan Firdaus
Private Law Vol 6 No 2 (2026): Private Law Universitas Mataram
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ypf1ek02

Abstract

This research aims to analyze, the legal framework required for the implementation of smart contract technology in the execution of authentic deeds and the implications of smart contract adoption on the authority, responsibility, and role of the notary as a public official. This study employs normative legal research with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative law approach. The results indicate that smart contracts are conceptually categorized as agreements, provided they fulfill the validity requirements as stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata). However, the necessary legal framework requires harmonization between the Civil Code, the Notary Office Act, and the Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT) Act, including regulations on electronic signatures and digital certificates to ensure legal certainty and protection. The novelty of this study lies in its conceptualization of the notary as a “digital gatekeeper” who bridges the automated, immutable “code-is-law” mechanism with the qualitative, subjective requirements of civil law (such as free will and legal capacity) which algorithm-driven systems inherently lack. The implementation of smart contracts does not eliminate the notary’s authority; rather, it fosters a transformation of the notary’s role from a mere deed-maker to a guardian of legal legitimacy for digital transactions. Notaries retain the fundamental authority to ensure the fulfillment of legal requirements for agreements and to provide both preventive and repressive legal protection for the parties involved. This study contributes scientifically by offering a synchronized regulatory model rooted in Progressive Law theory, serving as a conceptual blueprint for future civil law legislative reforms in mitigating blockchain disruption. Consequently, integrating smart contracts into notarial practice necessitates regulatory updates capable of bridging the principle of deed authenticity with digital technological advancements to guarantee legal certainty, justice, and utility in the digital era.