Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal)
Uzie Valerie
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
INCONSISTENCY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SEMA NO. 4 OF 2014 CONCERNING THE EMPTYING OF MORTGAGE RIGHT AUCTION OBJECTS: ANALYSIS OF COURT DECISIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR LEGAL CERTAINTY FOR CREDITORS Uzie Valerie; Wardani Rizkianti
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the inconsistency in the application of Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 4 of 2014 concerning the eviction of mortgage auction objects and its implications for creditor legal certainty. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory and case-based approaches, this research analyzes two court decisions: Palu District Court Decision No. 57/Pdt.G/2023/PN Pal and Klaten District Court Decision No. 93/Pdt.G/2019/PN Kln. The findings reveal that inconsistency manifests in two forms: procedural, where SEMA was entirely unaddressed despite physical eviction having been carried out prior to the verdict; and normative-substantive, where the creditor protection spirit underlying SEMA was ignored in the judges' legal reasoning. Both forms of inconsistency result in illusory legal certainty for creditors, rendering the parate execution right guaranteed under Article 6 of Law Number 4 of 1996 on Mortgage Rights effectively unenforceable in practice.
Co-Authors Wardani Rizkianti