Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

PAPER HUKUM PERIKATAN ANALISIS TUKAR MENUKAR TANAH PADA KELURAHAN BERINGIN KECAMATAN NGALIYAN KOTA SEMARANG Kevin Angelo Pangaribuan; Zaky Prasetio Emri; Ronaldindo Rifky Tri Handoko; Prastiwi Pramudya Putri; Jessica Leonita Anabel Ledewedjo; Rachel Netanya Panjaitan; Diana Febri Nauli Purba; Aulia Cantika Maharani; Rasya Aika Fadhila; Wardani Rizkianti
Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Analisis mengenai tukar menukar tanah di Kelurahan Beringin, Kecamatan Ngaliyan, Kota Semarang, bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi praktik tukar menukar tanah antara masyarakat dan pemerintah, dengan fokus khusus pada kasus Alm Hadi Muchtar. Penelitian ini berupaya memahami proses administrasi yang terlibat serta faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan sengketa dalam tukar menukar tanah milik dengan tanah eks bengkok. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif melalui wawancara dan observasi lapangan. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses administrasi tukar menukar tanah di Kelurahan Beringin belum sepenuhnya rampung, yang berdampak pada kesulitan ahli waris Alm Hadi Muchtar dalam membuktikan hak kepemilikannya. Ketidakselesaan dalam administrasi ini mencerminkan kurangnya itikad baik dari pihak pemerintah dalam melindungi hak-hak masyarakat. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya adanya perjanjian tertulis yang melibatkan pejabat berwenang untuk mencegah sengketa di masa mendatang. Secara keseluruhan, penelitian ini memberikan pemahaman yang penting mengenai dinamika hukum dan sosial terkait tukar menukar tanah di wilayah tersebut, serta implikasinya terhadap hak kepemilikan tanah bagi masyarakat
LEGALITY OF SALE AND PURCHASE OF INHERITANCE OBJECTS EXCEEDING THE LEGITIME PORTIE AND WAIVER OF ABSOLUTE RIGHTS IN THE MATARAM DISTRICT COURT DECISION Wafiy Ahmad Ardhika; Wardani Rizkianti
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i5.4436

Abstract

This article analyzes the legality of the sale and purchase of objects inheritance that exceeds the legitimacy of portie and the waiver of absolute rights in Mataram District Court Decision Number 109/Pdt.G/2009/PN.Mtr. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statute approach and a case approach. Normatively, the sale and purchase transaction of inherited objects that violates the legitimate share (absolute share) of straight-line heirs is invalid and can be cancelled, because it is contrary to Article 913 of the Civil Code which protects the absolute rights of heirs, as well as the principle of joint ownership of inherited goods as regulated in Article 833 of the Civil Code. The act of selling without the consent of all heirs also has the potential to be null and void according to Article 1471 of the Civil Code. Nevertheless, the Mataram District Court Decision rejected the lawsuit for cancellation of the gift because the panel of judges considered the gift valid as a legal act while the testator was still alive and had not yet become an inheritance. This approach shows that the court places more emphasis on the legal formalities of gifts than on the protection of legitimate portfolios. The rejection of this lawsuit was deemed inconsistent with substantive justice, but did not eliminate the heirs' substantive rights as legitimate heirs. The plaintiff's defeat was due to the inaccuracy of the legal basis of the lawsuit, in which the plaintiff should have pursued the incorting (reduction of the gift) mechanism specified in Article 916 of the Civil Code, rather than a lawsuit for annulment.
INCONSISTENCY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SEMA NO. 4 OF 2014 CONCERNING THE EMPTYING OF MORTGAGE RIGHT AUCTION OBJECTS: ANALYSIS OF COURT DECISIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR LEGAL CERTAINTY FOR CREDITORS Uzie Valerie; Wardani Rizkianti
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the inconsistency in the application of Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 4 of 2014 concerning the eviction of mortgage auction objects and its implications for creditor legal certainty. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory and case-based approaches, this research analyzes two court decisions: Palu District Court Decision No. 57/Pdt.G/2023/PN Pal and Klaten District Court Decision No. 93/Pdt.G/2019/PN Kln. The findings reveal that inconsistency manifests in two forms: procedural, where SEMA was entirely unaddressed despite physical eviction having been carried out prior to the verdict; and normative-substantive, where the creditor protection spirit underlying SEMA was ignored in the judges' legal reasoning. Both forms of inconsistency result in illusory legal certainty for creditors, rendering the parate execution right guaranteed under Article 6 of Law Number 4 of 1996 on Mortgage Rights effectively unenforceable in practice.
Analysis of The Bank's Civil Liability For Employees' Tortious Acts Committed Outside The Bank's Operational System Fauzan Hamzah Salampessy; Wardani Rizkianti
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3529

Abstract

This study examines the civil liability of Bank BNI regarding an unlawful act committed by the former Head of Cashier of the Aek Nabara Branch through an off-book transaction. The issues focus on the regulation of bank liability based on Article 1367 of the Indonesian Civil Code and POJK Number 6/POJK.07/2022, as well as the implementation of the principle of vicarious liability to employee actions that exceed the bank’s official operational systems. Employing a normative juridical method, this research concludes that the bank's liability stems from two complementary normative layers: Article 1367 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code as a general rule and Article 8 paragraph (1) of POJK Number 6/POJK.07/2022 as a sectoral regulation. Collectively, these regulations establish the bank as the party responsible for customer losses resulting from its employees' actions. The application of the doctrine of vicarious liability in this case is justified by the fulfillment of the employment relationship element and the doctrine of apparent authority, wherein the perpetrator objectively appeared as a bank representative to customers acting in good faith. Thus, Bank BNI's action to compensate for the customer's loss of IDR 28 billion is not merely a voluntary initiative, but rather a fulfillment of legal mandates rooted in the doctrine of vicarious liability and the fundamental principles of consumer protection within the financial services industry.
Personal Appearance Before The Notary In Deed-Making Through The Concept Of Cyber Notary: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia and the United States Zhafirah Salsabila; Wardani Rizkianti
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3548

Abstract

The development of digital technology demands a more efficient and adaptive transformation of notary practices through the concept of cyber notary that allows notaries to exercise their authority remotely. However, in Indonesia, this concept is limited by the principle of Tabellionis Officium Fideliter Exercebo which requires a physical presence as a prerequisite for the authenticity of the deed, as stipulated in Article 1868 of the KUHPerdata and Article 16 Paragraph (1) letter m of the UUJN. This legal vacuum regarding remote personal appearance creates uncertainty, since the UUJN simultaneously acknowledges the existence of cyber notary while it’s also lacking sufficient regulations to accommodate its implementation. In contrast to Indonesia, the United States has successfully accommodated the implementation of Remote Online Notarization (RON) through  the Revised Uniform Law on Notarial Acts (RULONA), specifically in Section 14A. This study uses a juridical-normative method with a comparative legal approach to examine the regulations governing personal appearance in deed-making under the concept of cyber notary in Indonesia and United States, as well as analyzing the potential expansion of its meaning. This research shows that Indonesia has an opportunity for legal digitalization through the UU ITE, the UUJN, and the implementation of the AHU Online system. The researcher argues that the concept of personal appearance can, in fact, be expanded not only as a physical presence, but also as an electronic presence. Therefore, its development is an inevitable necessity.