Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LEX FAMILIA: Journal of Islamic Family Law MUAMALAH: Journal of Islamic Economics and Business Law
Syahrial
STIS As-Sa'adah Sukasari Sumedang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Batas Usia Nikah di Indonesia Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 22/PUU-XV/2017 dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan di Indonesia Halmi Abdul Halim; Yudi Wahyudin; Fajar Meihadi; Syahrial; Ai Nurjannah
LEX FAMILIA: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): LEX FAMILIA: Journal of Islamic Family Law (Januari-Juni)
Publisher : Penerbit Lestari Sakha Pustaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

There is a change in the age limit for marriage in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, which was originally 16 years for women and 18 years for men, replaced with 18 years for Men and Women in Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage raises the question of whether the age of 18 is ideal for marriage? So what is the social impact? Moreover, there is a science that focuses on recognizing a person's soul, namely psychology, so if you look at it from a sociological perspective, the ideal age for marriage is 18 years old. From the results of the discussion, it was found that the ideal age for marriage for men and women is 17 years and above because the teenage phase has been passed so that the age of 18 years in the Law is considered ideal for marriage. Families will be more prosperous because the couple's maturity will result in good social interactions, there will be changes in social stigma in community customs, there will be increased legal efforts, there will be a reduction in the desire for early marriage and there will be reproductive health protection for women.
Dinamika Pemikiran Ekonomi Islam di Indonesia: Menakar Prinsip Bisnis dalam Pemikiran Adiwarman Karim dan Dawam Rahardjo Fauzi Abdul Azis; Syahrial
MUAMALAH: Journal of Islamic Economics and Business Law Vol 1 No 1 (2026): MUAMALAH: Journal of Islamic Economics and Business Law (April)
Publisher : Penerbit Lestari Sakha Pustaka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rapid growth of the Islamic economic industry in Indonesia has often been met with academic criticism regarding the imbalance between legal formality and the substance of social justice. This study aims to analyze this dynamic by comparing the construction of business principles from two of the most influential Islamic economic thinkers in Indonesia: Adiwarman Azwar Karim and M. Dawam Rahardjo. Using qualitative methods with a library research approach and content analysis, this study examines the primary works of both figures to map their epistemology, main principles, and business orientation. The results show significant paradigmatic differences. Adiwarman Karim represents a legal-formal approach that emphasizes the validity of contracts, the prohibition of MAGHRIB (Maysir, Gharar, Riba), and the concept of Economic Value of Time. His approach is top-down, focusing on strengthening financial institutions and Sharia compliance. In contrast, M. Dawam Rahardjo promotes a substantive-philosophical approach based on the Social and Economic Monotheism of the Constitution. For Rahardjo, business principles must be bottom-up, with an orientation toward empowering the people's economy, anti-monopoly, and distributive justice, transcending mere sharia labels. This study concludes that the tension between Karim's formalism and Rahardjo's substantialism is not a mutually exclusive conflict, but rather a complementary spectrum. Indonesia's Islamic economic ecosystem requires a synthesis of both: Karim's thinking is necessary to build the operational foundation and legal certainty of the industry, while Rahardjo's thinking is crucial as a moral compass to prevent business practices from becoming trapped in peci-wearing capitalism. This synthesis is an absolute prerequisite for the development of contemporary business models that are both professional and socially impactful.
Co-Authors Ai Nurjannah Fajar Meihadi Fauzi Abdul Azis Halmi Abdul Halim Yudi Wahyudin