Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pancasila and Law Review Constitutionale
Ikhsan Setiawan
Universitas Sriwijaya
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Protection of Personal Data Against Phishing in Indonesia: A Pancasila-Based Approach Gunsu Nurmansyah; Rudi Natamiharja; Ikhsan Setiawan
Pancasila and Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/plr.v6i1.4138

Abstract

Phishing in Indonesia presents significant risks to privacy and data security. This study employs a normative juridical approach to analyze the protection of personal data, with attention to both preventive and repressive legal mechanisms. It assesses the effectiveness of Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection in combating phishing, alongside measures of digital literacy and law enforcement. The findings indicate notable progress but highlight persistent challenges in enforcement capacity, public awareness, and international cooperation. The study recommends strengthening enforcement, expanding cybersecurity education, and enhancing cross-border collaboration to advance data protection.
Between Legal Certainty and Democratic Legitimacy: The Normative Void of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024 in Indonesia’s Constitutional System Ikhsan Setiawan; Muchammad Daing Azimattara
Constitutionale Vol 6 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v6i2.4647

Abstract

General elections are the primary mechanism for realizing popular sovereignty under the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024 marks a major shift in electoral design by separating national and regional elections, departing from the simultaneous model affirmed in Decision No. 55/PUU-XVII/2019. Although final and binding, the ruling creates a normative void due to the absence of transitional provisions. This study analyzes the constitutional implications of this paradigm shift, examines its consistency with prior jurisprudence, and evaluates regulatory transition options to preserve legal certainty and democratic legitimacy. Using a normative juridical method with conceptual and statutory approaches, the research finds that the divergence between the two decisions weakens legal certainty and risks institutional disruption, electoral disputes, and declining public trust ahead of the 2029 election. The case highlights tensions in the Court’s evolving role and underscores the urgent need for legislative action to establish clear transitional regulations to safeguard electoral stability and democratic legitimacy.
Co-Authors Gunsu Nurmansyah Muchammad Daing Azimattara Natamiharja, Rudi