Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pranata Hukum Jurnal Hukum Novelty PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Progressive Law Review Pancasila and Law Review Jurnal Hukum Bisnis
Gunsu Nurmansyah
Universitas Bandar Lampung
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
IMPLEMENTASI PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PARA MAHASISWA SEBAGAI PELAKU PENGANIAYAAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 13/Pid.B/2020/PN.GDT) Gunsu Nurmansyah; Bambang Hartono; Melika Rapita
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 7, No 2 (2021): Volume 7, Nomor 2 April-Juni 2021
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (781.127 KB) | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v7i2.3776

Abstract

ABSTRACT There are many irregularities in life that appear in the form of crimes and violations of the law, especially young people, one of whom is still a student, illegal acts often occur such as murder, violence, persecution, beatings, and many other illegal acts among them. Due to the influence of the bad social environment and the lack of parental supervision of children, many people's behavior is not well controlled. There are many rules that regulate various people's behavior, one of which is persecution behavior that results in the death of a person as stated in Article 351-353 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code. The existence of abuse by the perpetrator is indicated for the pain of a person, not for the purpose of his death, so it must first be proven that the element of intent is to cause the death of the person. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it was concluded that the acts of persecution committed by students against the death of a person were based on the fulfillment of the elements contained in Article 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code against perpetrators who participate in the persecution that results in the death of the person. Keywords: Criminal Liability, Crime of Persecution, Criminal System. ABSTRAK Banyaknya penyimpangan dalam kehidupan yang muncul dalam bentuk kejahatan dan pelanggaran hukum terutama golongan kaum muda yaitu salah satunya yang masih berstatus mahasiswa, sering terjadi tindakan ilegal seperti pembunuhan, kekerasan, penganiayaan, pengeroyokan dan masih banyak lagi tindakan ilegal lainnya di kalanganya. Karena pengaruh lingkungan sosial yang buruk dan kurangnya pengawasan orang tua terhadap anak, mengakibatkan banyak perilaku masyarakat yang tidak terkontrol dengan baik. Terdapat banyak aturan yang mengatur berbagai perilaku masyarakat salah satunya perilaku penganiayaan yang mengakibatkan matinya seseorang sebagaimana Pasal 351- 353 ayat (3) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Adanya penganiayaan pelaku sebenarnya ditunjukan untuk rasa sakit seseorang saja, bukan untuk tujuan kematiannya sehingga harus dibuktikan terlebih dahulu unsur kesengajaannya untuk membuat adanya kematian seseorang tersebut. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa perbuatan penganiayaan yang dilakukan oleh para mahasiswa terhadap matinya seseorang didasarkan atas terpenuhinya unsur-unsur yang terdapat dalam Pasal 351 ayat (1) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana juncto Pasal 55 ayat (1) KUHP terhadap pelaku yang turut serta melakukan penganiayaan yang mengakibatkan matinya seseorang tersebut. Kata kunci : Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan, Sistem Pemidanaan.
Analisis Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah dalam Proses Pembangunan Jalan Tol Berdasarkan Hukum Agraria Nurmansyah, Gunsu
Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Vol. 13 No. 01 (2024): Artikel Riset Januari 2024
Publisher : Information Technology and Science (ITScience)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47709/jhb.v13i01.3576

Abstract

Dalam peralihan hak atas tanah pemerintah mengeluarkan peraturan yaitu: Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 10 Tahun 1961 tentang pendaftaran tanah diubah dengan peraturan nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang pendaftaran tanah. Dalam peralihan hak atas tanah ada 2 bentuk yaitu: beralih dan diahlikan. Dalam penulisan jurnal ini penulis membahs sua masalah yaitu: Bagaimana bagaimana Peralihan hak atas tanah dalam proses pembangunan jalan tol berdasarkan Undnag-undang pokok Agraria? Kedua, Bagaiamana akibat hukum dari Peralihan hak atas tanah dalam proses pembangunan jalan tol di Indonesia. Dalam penulisan ini penulis menggunakan Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dan yuridis empiris. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah Secara khusus peralihan hak atas tanah untuk pembangunan jalan TOL harus sesuai dengan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pengadaan Tanah untuk Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum dan juga akibat pengadaan tanah, negara berkewajiban memberikan ganti kerugian, dengan mempertimbangkan prinsip-prinsip berikut: keadilan, kemanfaatan, kepastian, keterbukaan, kesepakatan, partisipasi, kesejahteraan, keberlanjutan, dan keselarasan.
inggris Gunsu Nurmansyah
Progressive Law Review Vol. 6 No. 01 (2024): APRIL
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/plr.v6i01.162

Abstract

The independence of judicial power is an absolute requirement for law enforcement and justice. The independence of judges is an essential principle in a democratic legal system. Judges should be free from political influence or pressure from any party and only decide cases based on relevant facts and laws. The question is, what is the role of judges in maintaining the independence of the judiciary, and what is the legal basis for guaranteeing judicial power to realize freedom and justice for the community in the judiciary in Indonesia? The role of judges in maintaining judicial independence is urgent in ensuring justice and truth in a case. Judges must have high integrity and not be pressured by any party, including the government or specific interest groups. Judicial independence also means that judges should be free to make decisions without interference from other parties. The legal basis for guaranteeing judicial power to realize freedom and justice is an essential principle in Indonesia's legal system. This principle emphasizes that the court must be free from political interference or pressure from any party to carry out its duties fairly and objectively.
Preventing AI-based phishing crimes across national borders through the reconstruction of personal data protection laws Nurmansyah, Gunsu; Wiranata, I Gede Arya Bagus; Fardiansyah, A. Irzal; Mladenov, Stanislav Vladimirov
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol. 15 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/jhn.v15i2.27558

Abstract

Introduction to The Problem: This study focuses on a new form of cybercrime due to advancing technology: AI-based phishing crimes. These crimes involve using artificial intelligence to misuse personal data on digital platforms or applications. Such illicit activities have significant implications and require attention. One significant threat in this context is the rise in AI-based phishing crimes, where attackers use sophisticated AI algorithms to deceive individuals and gain access to their data and information. Establishing solid and comprehensive personal data protection laws is critical to combating AI-based phishing crimes and protecting individuals across national borders. Purpose/Study Objectives: The study's object is cross-border AI-based phishing crimes, a new form of cybercrime due to technological advances. This study aims to analyze the concept of personal data protection in Law Number 27 of 2022 from the perspective of substantive justice and the prevention of AI-based phishing crimes. Design/Methodology/Approach: The author has conducted normative legal research or literature review with a meticulous approach to the principles of criminal law, a comprehensive comparative study of cybercrime law, and an in-depth exploration of the legal history of personal data protection law. Technical analysis, in the form of content analysis, is a series of methods that rigorously analyze the content of all forms of communication, categorizing them into matters related to AI-based cyber phishing, personal data protection regulations, information regulations, and technology. Findings: Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection can prevent phishing crimes through AI by implementing PDP principles adopted from international PDP principles. This can be done by referring to the OECD Guidelines Governing Privacy Protection and Cross-Border Flow of Personal Data and the data protection regulations in Indonesia. Paper Type: Research Article
Legal Protection of Personal Data Against Phishing in Indonesia: A Pancasila-Based Approach Gunsu Nurmansyah; Rudi Natamiharja; Ikhsan Setiawan
Pancasila and Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/plr.v6i1.4138

Abstract

Phishing in Indonesia presents significant risks to privacy and data security. This study employs a normative juridical approach to analyze the protection of personal data, with attention to both preventive and repressive legal mechanisms. It assesses the effectiveness of Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection in combating phishing, alongside measures of digital literacy and law enforcement. The findings indicate notable progress but highlight persistent challenges in enforcement capacity, public awareness, and international cooperation. The study recommends strengthening enforcement, expanding cybersecurity education, and enhancing cross-border collaboration to advance data protection.
LEGAL LIABILITY OF INTERACTIVE DIGITAL GAME PLATFORMS FOR VIRTUAL TRANSACTIONS BY MINORS Gunsu Nurmansyah
PRANATA HUKUM Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : Law Faculty of Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/pranatahukum.v21i1.431

Abstract

The rapid rise of interactive digital games has led to virtual transactions in which players purchase in-game items with real money. This becomes problematic when children, as dominant users without legal capacity, are involved. Game designs often exploit microtransactions and loot boxes that trigger impulsive spending, making children targets of economic exploitation. This study examines the legal liability of digital game platform providers under Government Regulation No. 17 of 2025, which implements Articles 16A (5) and 168(3) of the 2024 ITE Law. Using a normative juridical approach, the study analyzes regulations and literature. Findings highlight the need for stronger platform obligations, including age verification, parental consent, bans on covert practices, and tiered sanctions. Active state regulation and collaboration with platforms, parents, and society are crucial to ensuring a safe and child-friendly digital environment.
Consolidation of Competition Law and Consumer Protection Law in Indonesia : A Normative Study Based on Hans Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law wim badri zaki; Gunsu Nurmansyah; Wim Fadel Azmilhuda
Progressive Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): APRIL 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/prolev.v8i1.323

Abstract

This article discusses the urgent need to merge Indonesia's Competition Law and Consumer Protection Law into a single enforcement body. Since 1999, Indonesia has maintained two separate legal entities: the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) under Law No. 5 of 1999, and the National Consumer Protection Agency (BPKN) under Law No. 8 of 1999, with an annual budget of Rp 401 billion. Using a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this article assesses the legal validity of both laws after four amendments to the 1945 Constitution, evaluates the effectiveness of the dual institutional system, and advocates for consolidation based on Hans Kelsen’s pure theory of law and the principle of economic democracy. The study reveals that this separation has caused significant structural failures: by July 2025, Rp 265.49 billion in KPPU fines from 114 final decisions remained unenforced, and BPKN recovered only 10.6 percent of Rp 424.3 billion in documented consumer losses in 2024, with 70 percent of its recommendations ignored by government agencies. The total loss from these inefficiencies in a single year exceeds the combined budgets of both agencies. Considering models like the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), and noting that 89 of 148 countries adopted a consolidation approach, this article argues that establishing a Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (KPPK) is an urgent constitutional, academic, and fiscal priority for Indonesia.
Co-Authors Bambang Hartono Fardiansyah, A. Irzal Ikhsan Setiawan Melika Rapita Mladenov, Stanislav Vladimirov Natamiharja, Rudi wim badri zaki Wim Fadel Azmilhuda Wiranata, I Gede Arya Bagus