Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal)
Ilham Indra Mulya
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
LEGAL REASONS FOR THE JUDGE'S BOARD OF JUDGES TO APPROVAL THE LAWSUIT FOR REVOCATION OF CHILD CURRICULUM RIGHTS WHICH HAS HAD PERMANENT LEGAL FORCE Ilham Indra Mulya; Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21308245

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal reasons for filing a lawsuit for revocation of child custody rights after a final and binding decision and to analyze the legal considerations of the panel of judges in Decision Number 42/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Prob. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statute approach and a case approach. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials which are analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method. The results of the study indicate that the lawsuit for revocation of child custody rights after a final and binding decision does not conflict with the principle of ne bis in idem or the principle of legal certainty as long as it is based on changes in circumstances that affect the child's best interests. In addition, this study found that the Panel of Judges correctly accepted and examined the lawsuit by basing its considerations on changes in circumstances and protection of the child's best interests. However, in terms of the construction of the ratio decidendi in the decision, there is still room for strengthening, especially in linking the facts proven in court with the application of the principle of best interests of the child.
Co-Authors Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti