The author examines the role of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in prosecuting Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza that caused a severe humanitarian crisis. Although Israel is not a party to the Rome Statute, the ICC's jurisdiction is applied through Palestine's status as a state party. Using a normative juridical method, the study analyzes the international legal framework, doctrines of individual responsibility, and the theory of command responsibility regulated by the 1998 Rome Statute. The discussion highlights the ICC’s legal basis, including the principle of legality, complementary jurisdiction, and the elements of war crimes and crimes against humanity used to charge the two leaders as co-perpetrators in the context of an armed conflict. The article also examines the establishment of command responsibility for military and civilian officials who knew or should have known about violations of humanitarian law but failed to prevent or punish the perpetrators. The case contains evidence of the acknowledged use of the Hannibal Directive and strategic orders that strengthen the suspicion of intent and effective control over the criminal acts, rejecting immunity based on political office. In conclusion, the ICC applies the principle of individual responsibility to overcome impunity and affirm the supremacy of international law, despite facing political and jurisdictional challenges in enforcing justice for international crimes in the Gaza conflict.