Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal RESLAJ: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal FIQHUL HADITS: Jurnal Kajian Hadits dan Hukum Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Sulafah Deifa Fazaroh Adhellia
UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Hadis Kaum Lūṭ dan Larangan Pernikahan Sesama Jenis melalui Hermeneutika Fazlur Rahman Nichatus Sholikhah; Sulafah Deifa Fazaroh Adhellia
FIQHUL HADITS : Jurnal Kajian Hadits dan Hukum Islam Vol 3 No 2 (2025): FIQHUL HADITS: Jurnal Kajian Hadits dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Ma'had Aly PP. Zainul Hasan Genggong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66090/fiqhulhadits.v3i2.48

Abstract

Isu legalitas pernikahan sesama jenis menjadi perdebatan penting dalam hukum Islam kontemporer, terutama ketika dihadapkan pada ketentuan normatif mengenai larangan perilaku kaum Lūṭ dalam hadis. Penelitian ini menganalisis hadis-hadis tentang amal qawm Lūṭ melalui pendekatan hermeneutika double movement Fazlur Rahman untuk menelusuri ideal moral yang dikandungnya dan relevansinya terhadap larangan pernikahan sesama jenis. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah library research dengan kritik sanad–matan, analisis tematik hadis, serta rekonstruksi konteks historis dan normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa larangan terhadap perilaku kaum Lūṭ tidak ditujukan pada identitas seksual modern, melainkan pada pola perilaku seksual yang agresif, koersif, dan merusak tatanan keluarga dan masyarakat. Melalui kerangka double movement, penelitian ini mengidentifikasi tiga ideal moral utama—ḥifẓ al-nasl, ḥifẓ al-‘ird, dan ḥifẓ al-mujtama‘—yang menjadi dasar normatif larangan tersebut. Ideal moral ini secara konsisten mengarahkan kesimpulan bahwa pernikahan sesama jenis tidak dapat dilembagakan dalam kerangka fikih keluarga Islam yang mensyaratkan relasi laki-laki dan perempuan sebagai syarat esensial bagi keberlanjutan keturunan. Temuan ini sejalan dengan konstruksi hukum keluarga di Indonesia yang mempertahankan struktur heteroseksual sebagai dasar legalitas perkawinan. Kata Kunci: Hadis Kaum Lūṭ, Double Movement, Liwāṭ, Perkawinan Sesama Jenis, Maqāṣid.
Perbandingan Hukum Perkawinan Antara Mesir dan Malaysia dalam Aspek Perkawinan ‘Urfi: Status, Pengakuan, dan Perlindungan Hak Dewifa Winanda; Sulafah Deifa Fazaroh Adhellia; Nabiela Naily
Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal Vol. 8 No. 8 (2026): RESLAJ: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/reslaj.v8i8.12747

Abstract

'Urfi marriage is a practice of unofficial marriage that is recognized religiously but not recorded by the state. This phenomenon becomes a legal issue in various Muslim countries, including Egypt and Malaysia, which have different approaches. This article aims to compare the legal status of ‘Urfi marriage in Egypt and Malaysia, analyze its implications for the protection of women's and children's rights, and examine the legal proof consequences due to the lack of registration of such marriages. Using a normative-comparative legal research method with legislative and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes primary legal instruments from both countries as well as fiqh literature and relevant jurisprudence. Research results show that Egypt recognizes ‘Urfi marriages as legally valid in terms of religion but has required registration since 2000, whereas Malaysia does not legally recognize ‘Urfi marriages because they do not meet mandatory registration requirements. This difference has a significant impact on protecting wives' rights regarding alimony, children's identity, inheritance, and protection from domestic violence. This study concludes that the lack of registration in ‘Urfi marriages weakens the legal position of women and children, so there is a need to harmonize religious law and civil law to ensure substantive justice.
The Effectiveness of PERMA No. 1 of 2016 in Surabaya Religious Court Mediation, 2023–2025: A Legal-System Analysis Sulafah Deifa Fazaroh Adhellia; Ulinnuha Abdurrahman; Ahmad Wildan Rofrofil Akmal
Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 4 No 2 (2026): Adagium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : PT. Meja Ilmiah Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70308/2s97zk53

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2016 on Court Mediation Procedures through the fluctuating mediation success rates across all case types at the Surabaya Religious Court from 2023 to 2025. It asks how mediation success fluctuated during this period and how the regulation’s effectiveness can be read through Lawrence M. Friedman’s legal system theory. This normative legal research employs statutory and conceptual approaches, treating the court’s annual activity reports as secondary legal materials analysed qualitatively and prescriptively. The findings show that the success rate moved from 45.10% (2023) to 93.16% (2024) before falling to 71.55% (2025), while mediation reached only 8.70–9.45% of the cases decided each year. In terms of legal substance, PERMA No. 1 of 2016 provides no standard operational definition or indicator of mediation success. In terms of legal structure, the court faces a shortage of judges, limited funding for external mediators, and inconsistent reporting. In terms of legal culture, an orientation toward numerical targets and performance awards risks displacing the meaning of substantive peace. The study recommends standardised success indicators that distinguish full settlement, partial agreement, and case withdrawal, so that mediation statistics can serve as a reliable measure of the regulation’s effectiveness.
Co-Authors Ahmad Wildan Rofrofil Akmal Dewifa Winanda Nabiela Naily Nichatus Sholikhah Ulinnuha Abdurrahman