Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Community: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Achmad Dahlan
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta
Education Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
The Concept of Prophethood According to al-Alusi in his book of Tafsir Rūḥ al-Maʿānī Achmad Dahlan
Community: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Hasil Penelitian
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Tarbiyah Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61166/community.v5i1.188

Abstract

This research examines the concept of Prophethood (Nubuwwah) according to Mahmud al-Alusi as presented in his exegetical work Rūḥ al-Maʿānī. The study analyzes his comprehensive perspective on Prophethood and evaluates both the strengths and limitations of his thought on the subject. Employing a descriptive-analytical approach, the research collects and examines data from Al-Alusi’s tafsir alongside relevant authoritative scholarly sources in order to achieve its objectives. Particular attention is given to Quranic verses related to Prophethood and Al-Alusi’s interpretations of them. The study concludes that Al-Alusi developed a holistic understanding of Prophethood, regarding it as a lofty divine institution that integrates spiritual and moral perfection. He emphasized the role of Prophethood in the purification of the human soul and the cultivation of noble character, while presenting the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) as the supreme model for humanity. Although Al-Alusi maintained a balance between reason (ʿaql) and transmitted tradition (naql), his interpretations were at times influenced by Sufism and philosophy, which occasionally resulted in ambiguity in his presentation. Moreover, the study finds that his exegetical approach does not sufficiently engage with several modern intellectual debates concerning Prophethood and revelation, thereby limiting its applicability within contemporary intellectual discourse.
Co-Authors