Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Community: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Hammada Hanifi
Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Education Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
The Concept Of God According To Nietzsche And Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas Usmanul Khakim; M Shohibul Mujtaba; Hammada Hanifi
Community: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Hasil Penelitian
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Tarbiyah Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61166/community.v5i1.266

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the concept of God in the thought of Friedrich Nietzsche and Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas comparatively, with an emphasis on epistemological, ontological, and moral elements. To identify conceptual similarities and differences, a qualitative comparative approach was used, which included literature analysis and interpretation of the main texts of both figures. It is known that Nietzsche rejects the existence of God as a transcendent reality; he views God as a cultural construct that limits the “will to power” and produces slave morality, fostering nihilism and value relativism. Al-Attas, on the other hand, asserts that Allah is the Absolute Being, functioning as the foundation of existence and absolute morality; his concept of Tawhid is not only theological but also forms an epistemological and existential framework that integrates spiritual experience, reason, and revelation. Al-Attas's perspective distinguishes him from Nietzsche's deconstructive stance by offering a harmonious paradigm of life where divine revelation serves as the source of absolute truth and moral guidance. This outcome underscores the importance of Islamic theological foundations in addressing the chaos of meaning and values brought about by contemporary secular philosophy.
Co-Authors M. Shohibul Mujtaba Usmanul Khakim