Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Keabsahan dan Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kerjasama Berdasarkan Pasal 1320 dan 1338 KUHPerdata: (Studi Putusan 655/Pdt/2020/PT Bdg) Sharon Kristin Lubis; Said Rizal
Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Maret
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/jkih.v6i1.912

Abstract

Sengketa hukum dalam perjanjian kerjasama sering kali terjadi akibat perbedaan pemahaman interpretasi kontrak yang memicu tuduhan wanprestasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi keabsahan perjanjian berdasarkan Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata, memahami pelaksanaan perjanjian menurut Pasal 1338 KUH Perdata, serta menganalisis pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung Nomor 655/PDT/2020/PT BDG. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan dan analisis dokumen terhadap putusan pengadilan, KUH Perdata, serta literatur hukum terkait. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa meskipun sebelas Surat Perjanjian Kerjasama secara formil telah memenuhi syarat Pasal 1320, terjadi ketidaksesuaian dalam pelaksanaannya. Pengadilan Tinggi menilai hubungan tersebut sebagai kerjasama bisnis tanpa klausul ganti rugi eksplisit, sehingga kerugian dikategorikan sebagai risiko bisnis bersama dan gugatan ditolak seluruhnya. Disimpulkan bahwa kepastian hukum memerlukan penyusunan klausul yang rinci mengenai tanggung jawab dan alokasi risiko untuk mencegah sengketa akibat kekosongan norma dalam kontrak.
Child Protection in Mixed Marriages Between Indonesia and The Netherlands: a Settlement Through the Hague Convention and National Administrative Regulations Ridha Kurniawan; Said Rizal; Edi Hartono; Alfurqan Muslim; Abd. Sazeli Aziz
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v13i1.50400

Abstract

Child protection in mixed marriages between Indonesia and the Netherlands often faces obstacles due to fundamental differences in family law, civil registration, citizenship, and cross-border dispute resolution mechanisms. Administratively valid marriages in the Netherlands do not always receive similar recognition in Indonesia, leaving children's identities and legal status uncertain. The aim of this study is to comprehensively describe how the two countries regulate the status of children in mixed marriages and to assess any inconsistencies that pose risks to identity security and parenting. The method used is a normative-comparative analysis through a reading of the provisions of BW 1, Rijkswet op het Nederlanderschap, Wet Basisregistratie Personen, the 1980 and 1996 Hague Conventions, and Indonesian regulations such as the Marriage Law, the Population Administration Law, the Child Protection Law, and the Citizenship Law. The analysis shows that the Netherlands has a more integrated mechanism for child protection, supported by a national registration system and international instruments, while Indonesia still relies on religious legality and administrative procedures that often hinder identity registration. The analysis also shows that the asymmetry in the recognition of documents and decisions between countries is a major source of uncertainty regarding children's status. Recommendations include the need to ratify the Hague Convention, strengthen administrative cooperation between Indonesia and the Netherlands, simplify document legalization, and reform the Civil Registration and Civil Registration system to ensure more stable and equitable child protection in both countries.