Iib Marzuqi
Universitas Islam Darul Ulum Lamongan, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Forms of Presupposition and Construction of Ideological Meaning in the Controversial News of the Animated Film "Merah Putih: One for All" on the Cnn Indonesia YouTube Channel Umi Fitriani; Iib Marzuqi; Bisarul Ihsan
EDUJAVARE: International Journal of Educational Research Vol. 4 No. 02 (2026): EDUJAVARE: International Journal of Educational Research
Publisher : CV. Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/edujavare.v4i02.1560

Abstract

One of the important studies in pragmatics is presupposition or presupposition. This study aims to identify the form of presumption and analyze the role of presumption in constructing the meaning of ideology in the controversial news of the animated film Merah Putih: One for All on the CNN Indonesia YouTube channel. The method used in this study is qualitative descriptive. Data analysis using Yule presumption theory includes existential, factual, lexical, structural, nonfactual, and counterfactual presumptions as well as Van Dijk's critical discourse analysis theory which includes macro, superstructure, and microstructure structures. Data was obtained using the free participation (SBLC) technique. Based on the results of the study, six forms of presumption were found, namely (13) existential presumption, (11) factual presumption, (1) lexical presumption, (1) structural presumption, (1) nonfactual presumption, and (1) confactual presumption. These preconceptions not only serve as an implicit linguistic element, but also play a role in building ideological constructions in the news. The emerging ideologies are (2) the ideology of mutual cooperation, (3) the ideology of nationalism, (4) the ideology of democracy, (2) the ideology of education, (1) the ideology of legitimacy, and (16) the ideology of professionalism which is built through discourse strategies at the macro, superstructure, and microstructure levels.
Compliance and Violation of the Principles of Politeness in the Marlo-Keisya Podcast: "Don't Want It to End" on the Cataisee YouTube Channel Fadkhul Mu’is; Iib Marzuqi; Irmayani Irmayani
EDUJAVARE: International Journal of Educational Research Vol. 4 No. 02 (2026): EDUJAVARE: International Journal of Educational Research
Publisher : CV. Edujavare Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70610/edujavare.v4i02.1561

Abstract

Politeness in language is an important thing that needs to be considered when communicating so as not to cause hurt, disappointment or feel disadvantaged. This research aims to find out the principle of linguistic politeness and the violation of the principle of linguistic politeness which is validly studied in academic studies. The method used in this study is qualitative descriptive. The analysis was carried out using the theory of politeness according to Leech which put forward six principles, namely the maxim of wisdom, the maxim of generosity, the maxim of praise, the maxim of humility, the maxim of agreement, and the maxim of sympathy as well as the form of violation of linguistic politeness, namely the violation of the maxim of wisdom, the violation of the maxim of generosity, the violation of the maxim of praise, the violation of the maxim of humility, the violation of the maxim of agreement and the violation of the maxim of sympathy. The data was obtained through the technique of watching and recording. Based on the results of the study, there were 51 conversations that complied with or violated language politeness. Compliance totaled 20 data with details: (1) 3 Maxim Wisdom Data, (2) 1 Maxim Generosity Data, (3) 7 Maxim Praise Data, (4) 5 Maximal Humble Data, (5) 3 Maximal Consensus Data, and (5) 1 Maximal Sympathy Data. A number of politeness violations were found. 31 data with details: (1) 6 data on violations of the maximum of wisdom, (2) 1 data on violations of the maximum of generosity, (3) 7 data of violations of the maximum of praise, (4) 0 data of violations of the maximum of humility, (5) 13 data of violations of the maximum of agreements, (6) 4 data of violations of the maximum of sympathy.