Ali Yusuf Muzaki
Ma'had Aly Hasyim Asy'ari Tebuireng Jombang, Indonesia

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Reconstructing the Hadiths on the Obligation of Hajj: A Study of ʿIlal and Visa Quota Policies from the Perspective of Uṣūl al-Fiqh Ali Yusuf Muzaki; Zakaria; Muhammad Syafiiq; Ridwan; Ahmad 'ubaydi hasbillah
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 1 Februari 2026: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jipsi.v5i1.883

Abstract

This article aims to reconstruct the understanding of hadiths on the obligation of Hajj through the approaches of ʿilal al-Ḥadīth, and to analyse their implications for quota and visa regulations in the perspective of uṣūl al-fiqh. The hadiths concerning the obligation of Hajj essentially affirm a universal command for every Muslim who possesses the required capability (istiṭāʿah) to perform it once in a lifetime. However, in the contemporary context, the performance of Hajj faces various administrative regulations, such as quota restrictions imposed by the Saudi Arabian government and the requirement of visas as formal legal instruments. This study employs an integrative-qualitative design using both library research and field research, and applies three levels of analysis: fiqh al-Ḥadīth, ʿilal al-Ḥadīth, and naqd al-matn, alongside the uṣūl al-fiqh perspective related to taqyīd al-mubāḥ, maṣlaḥah mursalah, and the concept of istiṭāʿah. The findings indicate that quota and visa regulations do not contradict the substance of the hadiths on the obligation of Hajj; rather, they constitute a form of legal contextualisation aimed at safeguarding public interest, order, and the safety of pilgrims. Accordingly, the understanding of hadiths on the obligation of Hajj needs to be dynamically reconstructed so that it remains relevant to social realities and modern policy frameworks, without neglecting the authority of the hadith texts and the foundational principles of uṣūl al-fiqh.
Konsep Pahala Ilahi dalam Tasawuf Sunni: Analisis Pemikiran Imam Al-Nawawi tentang Ikhlas, Amal, dan Karunia Tuhan Ali Yusuf Muzaki; Zakaria Zakaria; Ridwan Ridwan; Agus Salim; M. Farid Zaini
Jurnal Shaf Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Shaf: Jurnal Sejarah, Pemikiran dan Tasawuf (April-September)
Publisher : Yayasan Haiah Nusratul Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59548/js.v4i1.649

Abstract

The concept of divine reward in the Sunni Sufi tradition intersects with issues of sincerity (ikhlash), the nature of deeds, and divine grace. Imam al-Nawawi (631-676 AH), as a central figure in Shafi'i-Ash'ari scholarship, holds a distinctive view on the relationship between sincerity, deeds, and divine reward. Previous studies have focused on reward within Mutazilah-Ashariyyah theological discourse and in interdisciplinary hadith approaches as offered by Azhary et al. in Nabawi Journal (2024), leaving the Sufi dimension of al-Nawawi's thought underexplored. This study asks: (1) how does al-Nawawi conceptualize divine reward from a Sunni Sufi perspective; (2) how do sincerity, deeds, and divine grace interrelate in his thought. A library research method with descriptive-analytical and comparative approaches is employed. Results indicate that al-Nawawi views sincerity as the primary condition for the acceptance of deeds, while divine reward remains entirely a grace that cannot be demanded. This affirms the unity of shari'ah, Sufism, and Ash'ari theology in al-Nawawi's thought.
Ethics of Submitting Targhib wa Tarhib Hadith on Social Media: Qawa'id al Tahdith Perspective Ali Yusuf Muzaki; Muh.Fatihuddin; Achmad Alfan Rosyidi Khalil; Khamim Khamim
al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Dosen Fakultas Agama Islam Indramayu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/afkarjournal.v9i3.3361

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of targhib wa tarhib hadith dissemination on social media through the analytical framework of the classical theory of Qawa’id al-Tahdith (principles of hadith transmission). The rise of digital technology has transformed the circulation of hadith in modern society, where many narrations are spread without proper verification of their chains of transmission or contextual understanding. Such practices have raised critical issues concerning authenticity, interpretation, and ethical communication in Islamic preaching. This research applies a qualitative method with a library-based approach, supported by phenomenological analysis of digital da'wah content across several social media platforms. The findings reveal that most targhib wa tarhib hadiths circulating online lack clear sources and authenticity status, leading to potential misinterpretations of Islamic teachings. The principles of Qawa’id al-Tahdith such as caution (taharri), selectivity (tamyiz), and awareness of the audience’s condition (ma’rifat hal al-mukhatab) are highly relevant as ethical guidelines for hadith dissemination in the digital era.
Performing Qadhā Prayer on Behalf of the Deceased: Hadith Study and Jurisprudential Analysis of the Four Madhhabs Ali Yusuf Muzaki; Ahmad Mukhlish Sirojuddin; Hafidhul Mubarok; Ridwan; Muthohharun Afif
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 5 No. 2 Mei 2026: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jipsi.v5i2.730

Abstract

This study investigates the Islamic jurisprudential status of prayers left unperformed (qadha shalat) by a deceased Muslim, combining rigorous hadith authentication (takhrij) with cross-madhhab legal comparison (muqaranah al-madzahib). The central question — whether a guardian (wali) may perform substitute prayers on behalf of the deceased by analogy with authenticated fasting-substitute hadiths — has generated sustained scholarly disagreement across the four Sunni schools. Drawing on primary classical sources and recent scholarship in Islamic law, including Scopus-indexed journals  and nationally accredited Indonesian journals , this article demonstrates that: (1) no explicit (sharih) sahih hadith authorizes qadha prayers by a guardian; (2) the juristic disagreement turns precisely on competing definitions of the legal cause ('illah) in the qiyas argument, not on the hadith texts themselves; and (3) the Hanbali dissenting position, though methodologically coherent, is based on an 'illah — "unpaid debt to God" (dayn Allah) — that the majority correctly identifies as too broad to sustain a valid analogy with prayers. The study contributes a technically precise ushul fiqh analysis of the qiyas structure, filling a gap in comparative Islamic law literature.
SEEING ANGELS (RU'YAT AL-MALA'IKAT) FOR NON-PROPHETS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPTS OF KASHF AND KARAMAH IN THE THOUGHT OF IBN HAJAR AL-HAITAMI AND AL-GHAZALI Ali Yusuf Muzaki; Muhammad Fatkhun Niam; Muhammad Syafiiq; Agus Salim; Muh. Fatihuddin; Nur Hanan
Jurnal As-Salam Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal As-Salam
Publisher : Asosiasi Dosen Perguruan Tinggi Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37249/assalam.v10i1.1667

Abstract

This study examines the discourse on the possibility of seeing angels by non-prophets from the perspectives of hadith and Islamic theology, focusing on the views of Ibn Hajar al-Haitami in Fatawa Hadithiyyah and their comparison with al-Ghazali's Ihya' 'Ulum al-Din. The study is motivated by the emergence of various claims of spiritual experiences in society that require scholarly clarification based on the Islamic intellectual tradition. This research employed a qualitative library research design using a descriptive-comparative approach. Data were collected from primary and secondary sources and analyzed through the stages of description, comparison, and interpretation. The findings indicate that both Ibn Hajar al-Haitami and al-Ghazali affirm that seeing angels by non-prophets is possible (mumkin) and falls within the category of saintly miracles (karamah). However, they differ in their approaches. Ibn Hajar emphasizes divine will within a hadith-theological framework, whereas al-Ghazali highlights inner spiritual purification through the concept of kashf within a Sufi paradigm. The study concludes that such experiences do not contradict Islamic theology as long as they are understood within proper theological boundaries, while providing a scholarly framework for evaluating contemporary spiritual claims in Muslim society.
SEEING ANGELS (RU'YAT AL-MALA'IKAT) FOR NON-PROPHETS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPTS OF KASHF AND KARAMAH IN THE THOUGHT OF IBN HAJAR AL-HAITAMI AND AL-GHAZALI Ali Yusuf Muzaki; Muhammad Fatkhun Niam; Muhammad Syafiiq; Agus Salim; Muh. Fatihuddin; Nur Hanan
Jurnal As-Salam Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal As-Salam
Publisher : Asosiasi Dosen Perguruan Tinggi Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37249/assalam.v10i1.1667

Abstract

This study examines the discourse on the possibility of seeing angels by non-prophets from the perspectives of hadith and Islamic theology, focusing on the views of Ibn Hajar al-Haitami in Fatawa Hadithiyyah and their comparison with al-Ghazali's Ihya' 'Ulum al-Din. The study is motivated by the emergence of various claims of spiritual experiences in society that require scholarly clarification based on the Islamic intellectual tradition. This research employed a qualitative library research design using a descriptive-comparative approach. Data were collected from primary and secondary sources and analyzed through the stages of description, comparison, and interpretation. The findings indicate that both Ibn Hajar al-Haitami and al-Ghazali affirm that seeing angels by non-prophets is possible (mumkin) and falls within the category of saintly miracles (karamah). However, they differ in their approaches. Ibn Hajar emphasizes divine will within a hadith-theological framework, whereas al-Ghazali highlights inner spiritual purification through the concept of kashf within a Sufi paradigm. The study concludes that such experiences do not contradict Islamic theology as long as they are understood within proper theological boundaries, while providing a scholarly framework for evaluating contemporary spiritual claims in Muslim society.