This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Padamu Negeri
Muhammad Ridho Gunawan
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

PARADIGMA LEGITIMASI HUKUM KONTEMPORER: INTERGRASI VALIDITAS FORMAL, JUSTIFIKASI MORAL, DAN PENERIMAAN SOSIAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF OTORITAS HUKUM JOSEPH RAZ Akhmad Qadar Ramadhan; Daffin Ramadhan Pradiza; Muhammad Ridho Gunawan; Surya Indra Danuarta; Elviandri Elviandri
Jurnal Padamu Negeri Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Juli : Jurnal Padamu Negeri (JPN)
Publisher : CV. Denasya Smart Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69714/mra44m10

Abstract

This study aims to analyze Joseph Raz's concept of legal authority through the Service Conception of Authority and examine its relevance to inclusive legal positivism in reconstructing contemporary legal legitimacy. The study is motivated by the growing crisis of legal legitimacy, reflected in declining public trust in legal institutions and the widening gap between the formal validity of law and its social acceptance. This research employs a normative legal research method using both a conceptual approach and a statute approach. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings indicate that legal legitimacy, according to Joseph Raz, depends not only on the formal validity of legal rules but also on the law's ability to provide individuals with better practical reasons for action through the dependence thesis, normal justification thesis, and pre-emption thesis. Inclusive legal positivism broadens the concept of legal validity by recognizing the role of moral values in determining legal validity. This study concludes that contemporary legal legitimacy should be reconstructed through the integration of formal validity, moral justification, and social acceptance, thereby producing a more adaptive and sustainable model of legal legitimacy for modern legal systems.