Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Optimalisasi Perlindungan Merek Dagang bagi UMKM pada Era Kecerdasan Buatan di Wilayah Banyumas Maya Ruhtiani; Pentadi Teguh Setiyanta; Monica Puspa Dewi
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat - PIMAS Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Februari
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/pimas.v5i1.2137

Abstract

Trademark protection plays a crucial role in supporting the sustainability and competitiveness of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), particularly in responding to developments in digital technology and artificial intelligence. This community service program was conducted to enhance the legal awareness and technical skills of MSMEs in Banyumas in the process of trademark registration and digital monitoring. The implementation methods included preliminary observation, problem identification, legal counseling, technical training on electronic registration through the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, and the introduction of digital-based trademark monitoring tools. The results indicate an increase in participants' understanding of the importance of trademark protection, their ability to prepare administrative documents, and their capacity to utilize technology for independent monitoring. The discussion demonstrates that an experience-based educational approach combined with structured mentoring effectively promotes MSME engagement in legal processes. This program contributes to strengthening the legal and digital capacity of MSMEs in addressing legal challenges within the context of digital transformation.
Translating Adat Reform into Judicial Reasoning: Legal Pluralism and Women’s Inheritance Rights in Bali Tijani Liwan Karamina; Yuris Tri Naili; Monica Puspa Dewi; Pentadi Teguh Setiyanta
Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Volume 5 Nomor 2 2026
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/inconcreto.v5i2.2513

Abstract

Balinese customary inheritance law operates within a plural legal order in which the traditional patrilineal kepurusa system interacts with evolving principles of gender equality and internal adat reform. This creates a legal problem when courts apply different understandings of the inheritance status of women who marry out of their natal families, particularly after the 2010 Decision of the Majelis Utama Desa Pakraman (MUDP) expanded recognition of women’s inheritance rights. This study examines the sources and forms of judicial incoherence in Balinese inheritance disputes and evaluates whether judicial reasoning reflects the normative development introduced by the 2010 MUDP Decision. Using normative legal research, the study applies statutory, conceptual, and case approaches to legislation, customary-law instruments, the MUDP Decision, relevant court decisions, legal doctrines, and scholarly literature. The comparative analysis shows that judicial reasoning remains divided between decisions that acknowledge the evolving character of Balinese customary law and those that continue to prioritize traditional patrilineal concepts such as purusa, sentana rajeg, and nyentana. This divergence demonstrates that judicial incoherence is not merely a consequence of legal pluralism but also reflects a gap between internal adat reform and its recognition in state adjudication. The study contributes theoretically by conceptualizing this inconsistency as an adjudicative recognition gap between normative change within customary law and its translation into judicial reasoning. It argues that greater consistency requires clearer recognition of adat reform, stronger incorporation into awig-awig and perarem, gender-sensitive interpretation, improved evidentiary standards, and consistent jurisprudential guidance to strengthen legal certainty and women’s protection in Indonesia.
Regulating AI in Nursing Education: Legal and Ethical Challenges of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Indonesia and Malaysia Maya Ruhtiani; Yuris Tri Naili; Monica Puspa Dewi; Pentadi Teguh Setiyanta
Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum Vol 6 No 2 (2026): Juli
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/jkih.v6i2.1041

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare education, particularly through Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS), has raised critical questions concerning legal adequacy, ethical governance, and institutional accountability. This study examines the regulatory and institutional readiness of Indonesia and Malaysia in governing the ethical use of AI-based CDSS in nursing education. Adopting a normative legal research approach, this study examines primary legal instruments, national policy frameworks, ethical codes, and institutional documents relevant to AI governance in educational contexts. The comparative findings demonstrate a significant disparity between the two countries. Malaysia exhibits a higher level of regulatory preparedness, supported by national AI strategies, ethical guidelines, and structured institutional mechanisms that facilitate the responsible deployment of AI in nursing curricula. Conversely, Indonesia lacks a sector-specific legal framework and institutional protocols, resulting in fragmented practices and normative uncertainty. The study further demonstrates significant variation in institutional responses to algorithmic accountability, professional responsibility, and the protection of care practices grounded in human values within artificial intelligence supported learning environments. These findings underscore the critical importance of coherent legal frameworks and institutional capacity in enabling ethically sound AI integration. The paper concludes by recommending the development of sector-specific regulations, the establishment of interdisciplinary oversight mechanisms, and the implementation of standardized ethical protocols to ensure that AI adoption in nursing education enhances, rather than undermines, professional integrity and ethical accountability.