Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Policy of Education Budget Allocation in Digitalization Policy through Procurement of Technological Devices to Fulfill Children' Constitutional Rights to Legal Literacy at Elementary Education Level Beby Savitri; Evita Isretno Israhadi
Jurnal Sosial Teknologi Vol. 6 No. 7 (2026): Jurnal Sosial dan Teknologi
Publisher : CV. Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/jurnalsostech.v6i7.32868

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal politics of education budget allocation within the digitalization policy and its implications for fulfilling children's constitutional rights to legal literacy at the primary education level. Through an examination of the Republic of Indonesia's 1945 Constitution, Law Number 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System, and Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection, the study used a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach, and regulations related to state finances. The results indicate that the educational digitalization policy, which focuses on the procurement of technological devices, is not completely aligned with the constitutional mandate, as it tends to neglect strengthening human resource capacity and children's legal literacy. This situation constructs a gap between legal norms and policy implementation, and has implications for children's low legal awareness and an increased risk of legal violations. Therefore, a reconstruction of the legal politics of education is needed through strengthening regulations, reforming budget policies, and integrating legal literacy into the primary education curriculum to ensure the optimal fulfillment of children's constitutional rights
Integration of Normative and Empirical Approaches in Modern Legal Research KMS Herman; Imanudin Suwardi; Alfin Suherman; Beby Savitri; Edy Krispono
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i3.143

Abstract

Background: Legal research often faces a methodological gap between law in books and law in action, which limits the understanding of why legal norms are not always effectively implemented in society. Objective: This study aims to examine methodological challenges in modern legal research by exploring the relationship between normative and empirical approaches from a socio-legal perspective. Methods: This study employs a normative-empirical literature-based approach using socio-legal analysis. Secondary data, including legal regulations, court decisions, and previous empirical studies, were analyzed through literature reviews and document analysis to identify gaps between legal norms and their implementation in practice. Results: The findings demonstrate that the relationship between law in books and law in action is dynamic and frequently influenced by social, cultural, economic, and power-related factors. Normative approaches alone cannot fully explain legal realities, whereas empirical approaches may lack sufficient prescriptive orientation. A socio-legal approach provides an integrative framework by combining normative analysis, empirical inquiry, and contextual interpretation. Conclusion: This study proposes a multi-level integrative socio-legal research design that bridges normative and empirical dimensions, enabling legal analysis to understand law not only as a system of formal rules but also as a living social practice.