Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lisanudhad: Jurnal Bahasa, Pembelajaran, dan Sastra Arab
Maskanah Alfiqhiyyah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
An-Naẓrah an-Naqdiyyah ʿinda al-Imām asy-Syāṭibī fī Bināʾ Fiʿl al-Amr wa Ḥukm al-Fiʿl al-Muḍāriʿ maʿa Nūn at-Tawkīd al-Mubāsyirah wa Nūn an-Niswah Zaenal Abidin; Ishomuddin Ahmad; Maskanah Alfiqhiyyah
Lisanudhad: Jurnal Bahasa, Pembelajaran dan Sastra Arab Vol. 4 No. 1 (2017): Lisanudhad: Jurnal Bahasa, Pembelajaran, dan Sastra Arab
Publisher : Department of Arabic Teaching, Faculty Tarbiyah, Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The eighth century of the Hijri era witnessed the emergence of a prominent scholarly figure in Arabic grammar, namely Imam al-Shāṭibī (may Allah have mercy on him). He was distinguished among the grammarians of his time by his independent approach to grammatical research and the verification of grammatical issues. He authored a work on Arabic grammar and morphology entitled Al-Maqāṣid al-Shāfiyah fī Sharḥ al-Alfiyyah li Ibn Mālik. This study aims to clarify Imam al-Shāṭibī’s critical perspective on the construction of the imperative verb (fiʿl al-amr) and the grammatical ruling of the present tense verb (fiʿl al-muḍāriʿ) when accompanied by the direct emphatic nūn (Nūn al-Tawkīd al-Mubāsyirah) and the feminine nūn (Nūn al-Niswah) by employing the analytical method. The study compares the opinions of scholars regarding these grammatical issues based on classical works of grammar, morphology, linguistics, and rhetoric, while evaluating and giving preference to the strongest opinions. The study finds that scholars have expressed various views on these issues. Imam al-Shāṭibī maintained that the imperative verb is built on sukūn (quiescence) unless it is a defective verb (muʿtall), presenting both criticism and refutation of the numerous opposing opinions. The study concludes that his view is the strongest because of the soundness of its evidence and its ability to withstand counterarguments.
Co-Authors Ishomuddin Ahmad Zaenal Abidin