Siti Fatimatuz Zahroh
Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University Of Malang

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Epistemologi Hadis Sufistik Syekh Ihsan Jampes dan Relevansinya Terhadap Problematika Krisis Etika Sosial Perkotaan Muhammad Arwani Rofii; Siti Fatimatuz Zahroh
Al-Mu'tabar Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Al-Mutabar
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hadis STAIN Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874//almutabar.2026.v6i1/3131/5

Abstract

Urban social problems in the modern era are characterized by the intensification of identity crises, symbolic competition culture, and tendencies toward social narcissism that trigger alienation and weaken the collective ethics of urban society. These phenomena indicate that urban social problems do not merely stem from structural and economic aspects, but are also rooted in the epistemological and spiritual problems of human beings. This article aims to examine the epistemology of Sufistic hadith in Shaykh Ihsan Jampes’ Kitab Manāhij al-Imdād and to analyze its relevance to urban social problems. This study employs a qualitative method based on textual analysis with an integrative Islamic epistemological approach emphasizing bayānī and ‘irfānī reasoning. The analysis focuses on how Shaykh Ihsan Jampes understands hadiths concerning arrogance (kibr) and self-admiration (‘ujub) as inner spiritual diseases that disrupt the formation of ethical consciousness and human identity. The findings reveal that Shaykh Ihsan Jampes’ Sufistic hadith epistemology positions kibr and ‘ujub not merely as individual moral violations, but as epistemological disturbances that damage human social and spiritual relations. This perspective has significant relevance in understanding urban social problems, particularly within the context of performative culture, social egoism, and community fragmentation. This article affirms that the integration of Sufistic hadith epistemology can enrich urban management discourse through the strengthening of social ethics, identity resilience, and urban human development oriented toward spiritual values.
Critique of Materialism in ‘Ilm al-Kalām al-Jadīd: An Analysis of Jamaluddin al-Afghani’s Thought Muhammad Arwani Rofi'i; Siti Fatimatuz Zahroh; Nodir Tolipov
Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies
Publisher : Center of Islamic and Occidental Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/jios.v3i2.80

Abstract

This article examines the concept of materialism from the perspective of ‘ilm al-kalām al-jadīd, focusing on the thought of Jamaluddin al-Afghani. It critically analyzes al-Afghani’s response to the rise of materialism in the 19th century within philosophical and theological debates in the Islamic world. The main objective of this study is to explain how al-Afghani formulated his critique of materialism and how his ideas contributed to modern Islamic theology. Using qualitative methods and content analysis, the study explores al-Afghani’s works especially al-Radd ‘alā al-Dahriyyīn alongside relevant secondary sources. The findings show that al-Afghani regarded materialism as a serious threat to moral and spiritual life because it rejects metaphysical elements such as God, the soul, and the afterlife. He argued that materialism weakens the ethical role of religion and leads to spiritual decline in Muslim society. Within modern kalām, al-Afghani sought to integrate Islamic theology with contemporary intellectual challenges without abandoning core principles. His critique significantly influenced modern Islamic thought by encouraging theological commitment while engaging with modernity
Fatima Mernissi’s Historical-Critical Methodology Toward Misogynistic Hadiths and its Implications for Contemporary Hadith Studies Umi Sumbulah; Siti Fatimatuz Zahroh
HUMANISMA : Journal of Gender Studies Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/humanisma.v10i1.10906

Abstract

Contemporary hadith studies face persistent challenges related to the use of certain hadiths that are frequently interpreted and mobilized in gender-biased ways within Islamic discourse. Such interpretations not only shape gender relations in Muslim societies but also reinforce social inequality through the normative and ahistorical legitimation of religious texts. This article critically examines Fatima Mernissi’s historical-critical methodology toward so-called misogynistic hadiths and analyzes its implications for contemporary hadith studies. Employing qualitative library research, this study draws primarily on Mernissi’s Women and Islam: An Historical and Theological Inquiry, supported by classical hadith literature and recent scholarship on hadith methodology and Islamic gender studies. The article argues that Mernissi should not be understood as a rejecter of hadith, but rather as a critical examiner of their historical authority, transmission contexts, and socio-political functions. By integrating isnād criticism, socio-historical analysis, and an examination of power relations in the construction of hadith authority, Mernissi’s approach contributes to a more contextual and gender-sensitive reading of hadith. At the same time, this article demonstrates that her methodology remains in tension with classical hadith epistemology, particularly regarding the limits of historical contextualization. The study concludes that engaging critically with Mernissi’s approach offers an important methodological dialogue that enriches contemporary hadith studies without undermining the normative authority of the Sunnah.