Revameila Susanti
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Legal Analysis of Citizens’ Legal Protection Against Adverse Administrative Decisions from the Perspective of Administrative Courts Revameila Susanti; Zulfi Ashari; Ahmad Ramdani; Nila Syahfitri Hasibuan; Tierra Kresna; Taufiq Alamsyah
Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): June: Anthroposia: Journal of Social and Human Development
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/9vf5mf29

Abstract

The increasing complexity of public administration and the expansion of digital governance have intensified the need for effective legal protection against adverse administrative decisions. This study examines the juridical framework of citizens’ legal protection within the Administrative Court system in Indonesia. The research employs a normative legal method based on a doctrinal approach using statutory, conceptual, and doctrinal analysis. Primary legal materials consist of the 1945 Constitution, the State Administrative Court Law, the Government Administration Law, Government Regulation Number 48 of 2016, and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019. These materials are complemented by scholarly literature concerning administrative law, judicial review, and administrative accountability. The findings indicate that legal standing constitutes the principal mechanism enabling citizens to challenge governmental actions before Administrative Courts. Judicial review has evolved beyond formal legality assessment toward broader scrutiny of governmental conduct and administrative accountability. The study also reveals that the effectiveness of legal protection depends not only on judicial accessibility and legality review but also on the implementation of court decisions and institutional compliance by administrative authorities. Administrative Courts therefore function as essential instruments for safeguarding citizens’ rights, maintaining legality, strengthening accountability, and reinforcing the rule of law within contemporary governance.  
Tindak Pidana Perbankan di Indonesia: Analisis Yuridis terhadap Jenis Kejahatan dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Revameila Susanti; Muhammad Haidar Pasha; Teguh Abdurrohman Shodiq
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 2 (2025): December: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/rrtwa083

Abstract

This study aims to examine banking crimes in Indonesia by focusing on the classification of types of banking offenses and the forms of criminal liability that may be imposed on perpetrators. The analysis is grounded in the recognition that the banking sector plays a strategic role in the national economy, such that any legal violation in this field has the potential to cause systemic losses and undermine public trust. The research employs a normative juridical method with a statutory approach, particularly referring to Law Number 7 of 1992 as amended by Law Number 10 of 1998 on Banking. The findings indicate that banking crimes encompass acts related to licensing, bank secrecy, supervision and regulation, as well as banking business activities, each of which is subject to strict criminal sanctions. Furthermore, criminal liability is not confined to individuals but may also be imposed on corporations and their management. This study underscores the importance of consistent enforcement of banking criminal law to ensure a sound, accountable, and equitable banking system.