Mappasessu Mappasessu
Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Ghazali Soppeng

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Civic Participation and Governance in Sustainable Development Initiatives: Evidence from Indonesia Mappasessu Mappasessu; Nabila Tijani Tharifah; Sunusi Dauda
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): :February: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studie
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/8nmdwd89

Abstract

This study examines how institutionalized civic participation shapes governance performance and sustainability outcomes across Indonesian localities through an empirical mixed-methods design integrating survey modeling and qualitative inquiry. Quantitative findings demonstrate that participatory intensity predicts governance responsiveness, policy learning capacity, and sectoral sustainability performance, while qualitative evidence reveals that deliberative forums operate as adaptive interfaces connecting citizen knowledge with administrative decision-making. Cross-scalar coordination emerges as a central mechanism through which participation enhances procedural legitimacy, collective efficacy, and institutional trust, particularly when civil society mediation and digital engagement infrastructures expand inclusivity and accountability. Environmental initiatives illustrate how participatory practices embed sustainability norms into routine governance, producing iterative feedback loops that strengthen implementation resilience. Persistent structural constraints, including uneven institutional capacity and symbolic inclusion, moderate these gains and highlight the necessity of organizational reform. The study contributes a multi-layered analytical framework that conceptualizes participation as a governance technology capable of generating measurable sustainability dividends when supported by institutional coherence, digital competence, and civic learning, advancing theoretical and methodological debates on participatory sustainability governance.
Constitutionalism and Democratic Backsliding: A Normative Analysis of Contemporary Governance Trends Mappasessu Mappasessu; Erniati Erniati
Iustitia: Journal of Legal Theory, Politics, and International Relations Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): February: Iustitia: Journal of Legal Theory, Politics, and International Relati
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article develops a normative-doctrinal framework for assessing democratic backsliding within contemporary constitutional governance. Departing from purely descriptive accounts of institutional decline, the study reconstructs constitutionalism as a principled architecture grounded in separation of powers, judicial independence, electoral equality, emergency limitation, and administrative neutrality. Through comparative constitutional analysis across federal, unitary, and multilevel systems, the research demonstrates that democratic regression frequently occurs through formally lawful amendments, statutory reforms, and regulatory recalibrations that preserve textual compliance while undermining substantive democratic guarantees. By synthesizing scholarship on executive aggrandizement, populist constitutionalism, supranational oversight, and emergency governance, the article articulates evaluative benchmarks capable of distinguishing adaptive constitutional reform from erosive transformation. The study further advances the concept of constitutional repair as a doctrinal mechanism for restoring institutional equilibrium. Its contribution lies in integrating normative reconstruction with comparative constitutional methodology to generate analytically rigorous and generalizable standards for diagnosing and responding to democratic backsliding in the twenty-first century.