Alifya Crystal Jasmine Zafira Zahra Budimansyah
Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Profile on Renewable Energy Measured Using a Science Literacy-Based Physics Assessment Instrument Alifya Crystal Jasmine Zafira Zahra Budimansyah; Mukhayyarotin Niswati Rodliyatul Jauhariyah
Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Volume 15 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026 in Progres...
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Critical thinking skills need to be investigated because students must be able to analyze information, evaluate evidence, and make scientific decisions when dealing with increasingly complex energy issues. This study aims to describe high school students’ critical thinking skills profile on renewable energy as measured using a science literacy-based physics assessment instrument. This study employed a quantitative descriptive method involving 69 tenth-grade students at SMA IPIEMS Surabaya. The research instrument consisted of 20 essay items containing contextual renewable energy stimuli, such as articles, data tables, pictures, infographics, and socio-environmental cases. The items were developed based on five Facione critical thinking indicators, namely interpretation, analysis, evaluation, explanation, and inference, and were integrated with PISA science literacy competencies. The instrument met theoretical feasibility with an average validity of 94%, all items were empirically valid, and reliability was categorized as very high. The results showed that the mean critical thinking score was 70.41, categorized as high. A total of 27 students were in the very high category, 20 students were in the high category, 15 students were in the sufficient category, 5 students were in the low category, and 2 students were in the very low category. The analysis indicator obtained the highest mean score of 75.54, while the explanation indicator obtained the lowest mean score of 67.07. These findings indicate that students were relatively strong in identifying relationships among information, but still need reinforcement in constructing coherent, logical, and evidence-based scientific explanations. Theoretically, these results support the relationship between science literacy and critical thinking. Empirically, the science literacy-based instrument can be used to map students’ critical thinking skills profile on renewable energy topics.      
Development and Validation of a Science Literacy-Based Critical Thinking Assessment Instrument for Renewable Energy Content Alifya Crystal Jasmine Zafira Zahra Budimansyah; Mukhayyarotin Niswati Rodliyatul Jauhariyah
Kappa Journal Vol 10 No 2 (2026): Kappa Journal
Publisher : Universitas Hamzanwadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29408/kpj.v10i2.35297

Abstract

This study aims to describe the theoretical and empirical validity of a science literacy-based critical thinking test instrument on the topic of renewable energy. The developed instrument integrates science literacy competencies to measure critical thinking skills while simultaneously fostering students’ science literacy within a single instrument. The instrument development followed the ADDIE model, focusing on three main stages: Analysis, Design, and Development. The instrument consists of 20 open-ended items based on Facione’s critical thinking indicators, integrated with science literacy competencies. Theoretical validity was obtained through a validation sheet reviewed by three expert validators in their respective fields, while empirical validity was obtained through a pilot test involving 34 students. The results of theoretical validity for the content, construct, and language aspects were 97%, 94%, and 90%, respectively, with an overall average of 94%, categorized as highly valid. Regarding empirical validity, all test items were deemed valid, with 14 items (70%) categorized as very high and 6 items (30%) categorized as high, and they exhibited a very high level of reliability. Based on difficulty level, 11 items (55%) were categorized as moderate and 9 items (45%) as easy. The discriminant validity analysis showed that 17 items (85%) were classified as adequate and 3 items (15%) as good. Overall, all items deemed valid can be used to measure students’ critical thinking skills in a comprehensive and structured manner.