Mahdi Handayani Sidik
Selçuk Üniversitesi

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

ISLAMIC EDUCATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR SDG 4: EDUCATION COMPARISON INDONESIA AND TURKIYE Muhammad Rizki Syahputra; Wahyu Iskandar; Masringgit Marwiyah Nst; Mahdi Handayani Sidik
EDU SOCIETY: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN, ILMU SOSIAL DAN PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): February-May
Publisher : Association of Islamic Education Managers (Permapendis) Indonesia, North Sumatra Province

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56832/edu.v6i1.2823

Abstract

Despite growing scholarly interest in Islamic education reform, empirical comparative studies examining how Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI) in Indonesia operationalize institutional management strategies to meet modernity's demands, benchmarked against internationally recognized models such as Turkey's Imam Hatip schools, remain absent from Scopus-indexed literature. This research gap motivated a qualitative multi-site case study at three MI in North Sumatra, Indonesia, complemented by cross-national comparative analysis with Turkish Imam Hatip schools, aimed at identifying, theorizing, and benchmarking management strategies that align with Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4). Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 18 institutional stakeholders across three MI in Deli Serdang and Medan, participant observation, and institutional document analysis over six months. Five strategic dimensions emerged: (1) integrative curriculum design combining Kurikulum Merdeka with Islamic studies; (2) character-based pedagogy embedded in daily Islamic routines; (3) participatory musyawarah governance; (4) ethically framed digital integration; and (5) teacher professionalism reinforced through PPG Madrasah certification. Comparative analysis reveals that while MI and Imam Hatip schools share foundational Islamic educational values, Turkey demonstrates stronger state-institutional coherence and systematized teacher formation, whereas MI exhibit greater community-driven governance flexibility. These findings offer a replicable governance framework for Indonesian MI reform and inform SDG 4 policy implementation within Muslim-majority educational systems.