Chlara Yunita Prabawati
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SELF-EFFICACY AND FAMILY RESILIENCE IN PARENTS OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES Reliani Reliani; Indah Setiyowati; Anis Rosyiatul Husna; Chlara Yunita Prabawati; Diah Priyantini; Siswanto Agung Wijaya
Psychiatry Nursing Journal (Jurnal Keperawatan Jiwa) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/pnj.v8i1.88434

Abstract

Introduction: Parents raising a child with disabilities experience a range of complex physical, psychological, social, and economic challenges. Internal psychological factors, particularly self-efficacy, often influence a parent's ability to cope with these difficulties. Higher levels of self-efficacy improve a family's capacity to adapt to and recover from the stress of caregiving, a concept known as family resilience. This study aims to explore the relationship between self-efficacy and family resilience among parents of children with disabilities. Method: This study employed a quantitative correlational design with a cross-sectional approach. The study population consisted of 59 parents of children with disabilities, selected using total sampling. Data were collected using a modified self-efficacy questionnaire based on Bandura’s theory and a family resilience questionnaire adapted from Walsh’s model. Data analysis was conducted using Spearman Rank correlation with a significance level of α = 0.05. Results: The findings indicated that the majority of respondents exhibited high self-efficacy (94.9%) and high family resilience (96.6%). A very strong positive correlation was identified between self-efficacy and family resilience (r = 0.809; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The study reveals a strong link between self-efficacy and family resilience in parents of children with disabilities. It underscores the need to enhance parental self-efficacy to boost family resilience when facing caregiving challenges.
Psychological Distress, Social Stigma, Depression and Mental Health Crisis Among Nurses in High-Pressure Clinical Settings Diah Priyantini; Erfan Rofiqi; Septian Galuh Winata; Chlara Yunita Prabawati; Dzakiyatul Fahmi Mumtaz; Ken Siwi; Annisa Wigati Rozifa; Daviq Ayatulloh; Nursalam Nursalam
Jurnal Keperawatan Muhammadiyah Vol 11 No 2 (2026): JURNAL KEPERAWATAN MUHAMMADIYAH
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30651/jkm.v11i2.32748

Abstract

Background: Nurses working in high-pressure clinical settings are frequently exposed to heavy workloads, emotional demands, and challenging working environments that may compromise their psychological well-being. Persistent occupational stress, combined with negative societal perceptions and stigma toward healthcare professionals, may contribute to psychological distress, depression, and broader mental health crises among nurses. Understanding the relationship between psychological distress and social stigma is essential to identify factors contributing to mental health problems in nursing professionals. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between June and October 2021 involving 2,156 nurses working in high-pressure clinical units across Indonesia. Data were collected using an online questionnaire consisting of sociodemographic characteristics, measures of psychological distress, and social stigma perceptions, along with a modified Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21). A researcher-developed mental health crisis scale was also used to assess severe psychological conditions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, and Spearman’s rho correlation with a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: Most participants were aged 20–29 years (44.6%) and female (67.5%). Psychological distress was reported at moderate levels among 78.4% of respondents, while 18.5% experienced perceived social stigma. Severe depression was identified in 64.5% of nurses, and 63.5% reported severe mental health crisis conditions. Psychological distress and perceived social stigma were significantly associated with higher levels of depression and mental health crises among nurses (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Psychological distress and social stigma were significant factors associated with depression and mental health crises among nurses working in high-pressure clinical environments. These findings highlight the importance of implementing institutional mental health support systems, stigma reduction initiatives, and workplace interventions to protect nurses’ psychological well-being.