Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pemberdayaan Sosial dan Teknologi Masyarakat Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy
Abdul Azis Manurung
Universitas Muhammadiyah Asahan
Religion Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENYULUHAN HUKUM TENTANGPIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU PENGANIAYAAN DENGAN RETARDASI MENTAL Sofian Sofian; Abdul Azis Manurung; Ari Dermawan
Jurnal Pemberdayaan Sosial dan Teknologi Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jpstm.v5i2.5373

Abstract

Abstract:Mental retardation is categorized as People with Mental Problems (ODMK) as referred to in Article 1 number 2 of Law Number 18 of 2014 concerning Mental Health, namely people who have physical, mental, social, developmental, and/or quality of life problems who are at risk of experiencing mental disorders. This thesis aims to analyze how criminal liability is applied to perpetrators of criminal acts of abuse who suffer from mental retardation, as well as to re-analyze the basis for the judge's considerations in issuing a verdict against the perpetrator, by referring to Decision Number 817/Pid.B/2024/PN.Kis. This study uses a normative juridical approach method with a descriptive research type. Data were obtained through literature studies by reviewing statutory regulations, legal literature, and court decision documents. The analysis was carried out qualitatively-descriptively against relevant legal norms and concrete case studies. The results of the study indicate that perpetrators of criminal acts of abuse who suffer from mental retardation cannot be fully held criminally responsible if it is proven that their mental condition affects their ability to understand or control their actions as regulated in Article 44 of the Criminal Code. In Case Number 817/Pid.B/2024/PN.Kis, although the defendant was proven to have committed assault according to Article 351 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, ideally the medical evidence process related to the defendant's mental condition would be the main basis in the judge's considerations, as well as trial facts to determine the appropriateness of criminal responsibility for the defendant in accordance with the principles of criminal law and protection for people with mental retardation. Keywords: Criminal, Responsibility  Abstrak: Retardasi mental dikategorikan sebagai Orang Dengan Masalah Kejiwaan (ODMK) sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 1 angka 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2014 tentang Kesehatan Jiwa, yaitu orang yang memiliki masalah fisik, mental, sosial, pertumbuhan, dan/atau kualitas hidup yang berisiko mengalami gangguan jiwa. Skripsi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana diterapkan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penganiayaan yang mengalami retardasi mental, serta menganalisis kembali dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap pelaku tersebut, dengan merujuk pada Putusan Nomor 817/Pid.B/2024  /PN.Kis. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan dengan mengkaji peraturan Perundang-Undangan, literatur hukum, serta dokumen putusan pengadilan. Analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif-deskriptif terhadap norma hukum yang relevan serta studi kasus konkret. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaku tindak pidana penganiayaan yang menderita retardasi mental tidak dapat sepenuhnya dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana apabila terbukti bahwa kondisi kejiwaannya memengaruhi kemampuannya memahami atau mengendalikan perbuatannya sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 44 KUHP. Dalam Perkara Nomor 817/Pid.B/  2024/PN.Kis, meskipun terdakwa terbukti melakukan penganiayaan sesuai Pasal 351 ayat (1) KUHP, idealnya proses pembuktian medis terkait kondisi kejiwaan terdakwa akan menjadi landasan utama dalam pertimbangan hakim. serta fakta persidangan untuk menentukan kelayakan pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap terdakwa sesuai prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana dan perlindungan terhadap ODMK. Kata Kunci: Pidana, Pertanggungjawaban
ASPECTS ACTION CRIMINAL IN ENCROACHMENT EX HGU LAND BY THE COMMUNITY Abdul Azis Manurung; Alfiandi Wisudawansyah Nasution; Syafrizal; Ismail; Sofian
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Encroachment land former Right to Cultivate (HGU) is problem complex laws​ Because involving aspect law criminal law​ agrarian , administration land , as well as conflict social between society , companies , and government . Research This aim For analyze aspects action criminal in control and encroachment land former HGU by the community in the Regency Asahan , North Sumatra, and identify form accountability criminal offenses that can be applied . Research use method law juridical normatively supported​ approach empirical . Data obtained through studies to regulation legislation , documents land , decision court , as well as interview with apparatus enforcer law , agency land , government areas and communities that control land former HGU. Research results show that mastery land former HGU not in a way automatic can qualified as action criminal encroachment land . Determination element criminal must based on the clarity of the rights status on land , expiry of HGU validity period , return process land to the state, the existence of right other legitimate parties , as well as element intent and action oppose law . Form action potential criminal offenses happen covering enter or control land without permit , forgery document land , destruction , threats , violence and actions obstruct implementation decision or policy government . However , the use of law criminal must done in a way carefully and placed as effort final Because part conflict sourced from ambiguity administration , inequality mastery land , and demands redistribution land by the community . Completion case need coordination between government area , office land , apparatus enforcer law , companies and society through land status verification , mediation , reform agrarian , as well as enforcement the law that provides certainty , justice and protection for all over party .
Co-Authors Alfiandi Wisudawansyah Nasution Ari Dermawan Ismail Sofian Sofian Sofian Syafrizal