Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS
Biner Sihotang
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Akibat Hukum bagi Notaris dan PPAT Atas Pengalihan Hak Kepemilikan Sertifikat Dengan Akta Kuasa Jual Palsu Dalam Jual Beli Tanah Ferghinna Andienia Putri Manan; Biner Sihotang
JURNAL HUKUM STAATRECHTS Vol 8, No 1 (2025): JURNAL STAATRECHTS
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52447/sr.v8i1.8198

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas akibat hukum terhadap Notaris dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) yang melakukan pengalihan hak kepemilikan atas sertifikat hak milik dengan menggunakan akta kuasa jual dan akta jual beli palsu. Studi ini berfokus pada kasus yang tertuang dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 248/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 249/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan serta studi kasus terhadap putusan pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Notaris dan PPAT yang terbukti melakukan pemalsuan akta dapat dikenakan sanksi pidana, perdata, serta sanksi administratif sesuai peraturan yang berlaku. Selain itu, keterlibatan Notaris dan PPAT dalam tindakan pemalsuan akta berdampak pada rusaknya kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap sistem hukum pertanahan di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pengawasan lebih ketat terhadap praktik Notaris dan PPAT guna mencegah terulangnya kasus serupa di masa depan.
Protection of the Rights of Secured Creditors Who Reject the Composition in the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations: An Analysis of Articles 281 and 286 of the Law on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations from the Perspective of Legal Politics and Legal Certainty Biner Sihotang
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3614

Abstract

This research analyzes the legal position of secured creditors who reject the composition in the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) process, particularly in relation to the normative conflict between the Law on Mortgage Rights (UUHT) and the Law on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (UUK PKPU). The UUHT provides absolute protection through the principles of droit de préférence and droit de suite, whereas the PKPU limits these rights through the stay period and the voting mechanism of the composition plan. Tension arises when secured creditors who reject the composition remain bound by the voting outcome, even though their rights originate from proprietary security rights that constitute real rights. By using a normative juridical method enriched with a legal hermeneutic approach, a limited comparative analysis, and a legal-political analysis, this research finds that Articles 281 and 286 of the UUK PKPU do not provide adequate protection mechanisms for secured creditors. The minutes of the Working Committee of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia (DPR-RI) in 2004 indicate that the lawmakers did not intend to downgrade the status of proprietary rights; thus, the current normative design of the PKPU creates a legislative gap that deviates from the original objectives of its formation. The lack of synchronization between the Law on Mortgage Rights (UUHT) and the Law on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (UUK PKPU) creates legal uncertainty, undermines substantive justice, and has serious implications for the investment climate and national financial stability. This research recommends regulatory harmonization through objection procedures, opt-out mechanisms, protection of collateral value, and the revision of Article 286 of the UUK PKPU to align with the principles of proprietary rights and international standards of creditor protection. Keywords: Mortgage rights, legal certainty, secured creditors, Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU)
Co-Authors Ferghinna Andienia Putri Manan