M. Shidqon Prabowo
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Protection for Consumers Against Food Products that are not Halal Certified Based on Law Number 33 of 2014 Ribut Widiono; M. Shidqon Prabowo; Bahrul Fawaid
JURNAL AKTA Vol 12, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v12i4.49601

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal protection provided to consumers against the circulation of food products that are not halal certified based on Law Number 33 of 2014 concerning Halal Product Assurance. The certification process involves three main institutions: the Halal Product Assurance Organizing Agency as the organizing authority, the Halal Inspection Institute as the inspection and testing institution, and the Indonesian Ulema Council as the institution that issues fatwas on halal product certification. Legal protection for Muslim consumers is reflected in the principles of protection, responsibility, and transparency of information, which are strengthened by reporting mechanisms and the imposition of sanctions on violating business actors. This study uses a normative juridical approach with descriptive analysis of legal norms to examine the provisions, enforcement mechanisms, and implications of the Halal Product Assurance Law for consumer protection. The results show that although the Halal Product Assurance Law provides a strong legal basis, its implementation is still hampered by weak supervision, lack of socialization, and limited coordination between institutions. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen Halal Product Assurance Organizing Agency, increase public awareness, and align halal policies with consumer protection regulations to ensure legal certainty and public trust.
LEGAL CHALLENGES OF CORETAX SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION: HARMONIZATION OF PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION AND ELECTRONIC INFORMATION SECURITY M. Shidqon Prabowo
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.2.1090-1107

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the harmonization of the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT)'s authority regulations in implementing Coretax with data subject rights under the Personal Data Protection Law (PDP Law), and to examine the DGT's legal accountability as an Electronic System Operator under the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), particularly in cases of system failure or data leaks. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal materials analyzed include the KUP Law, the PDP Law, the ITE Law, and Presidential Regulation Number 40 of 2018, and are supported by relevant scientific literature and previous research. The analysis was conducted qualitatively to identify relationships, potential conflicts, and harmonization between legal regimes within the Coretax ecosystem. The results show that the DGT has a dual position as a fiscal authority as well as a data controller and electronic system operator, which creates complex legal authorities and responsibilities. A normative gap was found in the form of unclear technical standards for data protection, including DPIA and system security standards, as well as weak cross-agency responsibility regulations. Furthermore, the failure of the Coretax system also resulted in a decline in public trust and increased legal risks. This research emphasizes the need for regulatory harmonization and strengthened data governance to ensure legal certainty and personal data protection in the digital tax system.