Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Legitimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law Open Access DRIVERset
Faiz Aulia Rahman
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Antara Suap dan Gratifikasi Terkait Penerapan Pasal 11 dan Pasal 12B UU TIPIKOR Faiz Aulia Rahman; Irwan Triadi
Legtimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Legitimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jolil.v1i2.1935

Abstract

This study examines the legal distinction and application between bribery under Article 11 and gratification under Article 12B of the Indonesian Anti-Corruption Law. Utilizing a qualitative method with a statute approach, the research analyzes statutory definitions and Supreme Court jurisprudence. Significant ambiguity exists due to overlapping elements, necessitating a clear differentiation between transactional bribery and gratification. The findings reveal that bribery requires a "meeting of mind" and explicit transactional intent. Conversely, gratification functions as disguised bribery, characterized by the absence of a formal consensus and, in specific cases, the application of a reverse burden of proof. Judicial patterns indicate that Article 12B serves as a preventive tool for latent corruption, while Article 11 acts as a repressive instrument for explicit transactions. Consistency in law enforcement is vital for establishing legal certainty and effectively eradicating corruption within the Indonesian legal system. Analysis underscores the critical importance of judicial consistency for justice.
Perbandingan Antara Suap dan Gratifikasi Terkait Penerapan Pasal 11 dan Pasal 12B UU TIPIKOR Faiz Aulia Rahman; Irwan Triadi
Legtimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Legitimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jolil.v1i2.1935

Abstract

This study examines the legal distinction and application between bribery under Article 11 and gratification under Article 12B of the Indonesian Anti-Corruption Law. Utilizing a qualitative method with a statute approach, the research analyzes statutory definitions and Supreme Court jurisprudence. Significant ambiguity exists due to overlapping elements, necessitating a clear differentiation between transactional bribery and gratification. The findings reveal that bribery requires a "meeting of mind" and explicit transactional intent. Conversely, gratification functions as disguised bribery, characterized by the absence of a formal consensus and, in specific cases, the application of a reverse burden of proof. Judicial patterns indicate that Article 12B serves as a preventive tool for latent corruption, while Article 11 acts as a repressive instrument for explicit transactions. Consistency in law enforcement is vital for establishing legal certainty and effectively eradicating corruption within the Indonesian legal system. Analysis underscores the critical importance of judicial consistency for justice.
Co-Authors Irwan Triadi