Tajuddin Noor
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara Medan

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPOSING SANCTIONS MINIMUM PENALTY IN CORRUPTION Andria Hariza Nugraha; Tajuddin Noor; Panca Sarjana Putra
Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Edition January 2026
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/metadata.v8i1.956

Abstract

The imposition of a criminal under a special minimum criminal sanction in Law Number 31 juncto Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the eradication of corruption crimes, where the imposition of a criminal under the special minimum criminal sanction in the crime of corruption is basically unjustifiable based on legal justice. The results of the study show that the judge's consideration in imposing a criminal sentence on the perpetrators of corruption crimes according to the Supreme Court Decision Number 3280 K/Pid.Sus/2024 is the existence of elements of state financial losses or the state economy as a result of the criminal acts of corruption so that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 2 (two) years and 6 (six) months and a fine of Rp. 100,000,000,- (one hundred million rupiah).
THE ROLE OF THE POLICE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST PERPETRATORS CORRUPTION CRIMES THAT OCCURRED IN INDONESIA Yogi Yahya Butar-Butar; Tajuddin Noor; Cut Nurita
Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Edisi Januari 2025
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/metadata.v8i1.974

Abstract

The police are authorized to investigate corruption crimes, but this authority is shared with the KPK and the Prosecutor's Office.. Law enforcement against perpetrators of corruption crimes that occur in the jurisdiction of the Serdang Bedagai I Resort Police is to conduct investigations into corruption cases that are not eligible to be investigated by the Corruption Eradication Commission. The Corruption Eradication Commission can only investigate corruption cases involving state apparatus and resulting in state financial losses of at least Rp.1,000,000,000.00 (one billion rupiah), for this reason the role of the prosecutor is needed as an investigator for corruption cases that are not eligible to be investigated by the Corruption Eradication Commission.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF INVESTIGATORS IN RESOLVING CRIMINAL ACTS OF CHILD ABUSE THROUGH RESTORATIVE JUSTICE APPROACHES (RESEARCH STUDY AT THE COAL RESORT POLICE) Taufiq Hidayat Thayeb; Cut Nurita; Tajuddin Noor
Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Edisi Januari 2025
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/metadata.v7i1.975

Abstract

Restorative justice in persecution is an approach to criminal case resolution that involves perpetrators, victims, and related parties to find a common solution that emphasizes restoration rather than retaliation. The regulation of restorative justice law against children who commit criminal acts of abuse is based on Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, the Regulation of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2021 concerning the Handling of Crimes Based on Restorative Justice. Law enforcement with restorative justice at the Batu Bara Resort Police in the process of investigating children as perpetrators of criminal acts of persecution is the application of an approach that prioritizes the recovery of victims and the community.