Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA
Panca Sarjana Putra
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara Medan
Religion Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN IMPOSING SANCTIONS MINIMUM PENALTY IN CORRUPTION Andria Hariza Nugraha; Tajuddin Noor; Panca Sarjana Putra
Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Edition January 2026
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/metadata.v8i1.956

Abstract

The imposition of a criminal under a special minimum criminal sanction in Law Number 31 juncto Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the eradication of corruption crimes, where the imposition of a criminal under the special minimum criminal sanction in the crime of corruption is basically unjustifiable based on legal justice. The results of the study show that the judge's consideration in imposing a criminal sentence on the perpetrators of corruption crimes according to the Supreme Court Decision Number 3280 K/Pid.Sus/2024 is the existence of elements of state financial losses or the state economy as a result of the criminal acts of corruption so that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 2 (two) years and 6 (six) months and a fine of Rp. 100,000,000,- (one hundred million rupiah).
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF FINES AS AN EFFORT TO RECOVER LOSSES THE STATE IN THE CASE OF CORRUPTION (STUDY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA DECISION NUMBER 2379 K/PID.SUS/2024) Fadhil Fahreza; Panca Sarjana Putra; Adil Akhyar
Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Edition January 2026
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/metadata.v8i1.961

Abstract

Criminal fines in the context of corruption can be an effort to recover state losses, although it is not the only way. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the judge's legal considerations in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Decision Number 2379 K/Pid.Sus/2024 regarding the penalty of fines for the return of state losses in the case of corruption are that the defendant has enjoyed money from the crime, then the appropriate fine against the Defendant is Rp.200,000,000.00 (two hundred million rupiah) to Rp. 300,000,000.00 (three hundred million rupiah) because it is seen from the aspect of the State's losses is included in the low category and seen from the aspect of profit return is included in the low category because the Defendant only returns the State's losses less than 50% (fifty percent).
CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR PERPETRATORS OF VANDALISM OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE EVIDENCE IN THE PROCESS INVESTIGATION OF CORRUPTION (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 6/PID.SUS-TPK/2024/PN. PGP) Rahmad Romy Agustiando Tampubolon; Danial Syah; Panca Sarjana Putra
Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Edition January 2026
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/metadata.v8i1.967

Abstract

Obstruction of justice, which is the act of deliberately obstructing or thwarting the investigation process, can interfere with the law enforcement process and create distrust in the justice system. The results of the research and discussion show that the form of the perpetrator obstructing the investigation (obstruction of justice) in the criminal act of corruption is the provisions of Article 21 of Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. Criminal liability for perpetrators of obstruction of justice in corruption cases can be charged through Article 221 of the Criminal Code and Article 21 of Law No. 31 of 1999. The perpetrator of obstruction of justice in the corruption case of Toni Tamsil based on Decision Number 6/Pid.Sus-TPk/2024/PN Pgp has been legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a criminal act by deliberately obstructing the investigation of a corruption case. As a result of his actions, the perpetrator was sentenced to imprisonment for 3 (three) years.
LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE CHILDREN INVOLVED NARCOTICS ABUSE CRIMES IN THE JURISDICTION OF SABANG CITY Zaizil Ihza Mahendra; Mustamam Mustamam; Panca Sarjana Putra
Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Edisi Januari 2025
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/metadata.v7i1.976

Abstract

Legal protection for drug users, according to Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, is provided through medical and social rehabilitation for addicts and victims of abuse. Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection provides special protection for children as drug users, which also views children as both victims and perpetrators. Therefore, priority is given to supervision, treatment, and rehabilitation, rather than just criminalization. Legal provisions for children in conflict with the law are in accordance with Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Legal accountability for children who use narcotics uses a juvenile criminal justice system that prioritizes action and rehabilitation, not just criminal penalties, with a maximum penalty of half the adult penalty. Children are considered both perpetrators and victims, so that in addition to criminal sanctions, judges can also impose rehabilitation and guidance measures to restore children and prevent them from abusing drugs again, in accordance with the Narcotics Law and the Child Protection Law. Legal protection for children as perpetrators of narcotics crimes, if the child is a perpetrator of narcotics abuse, prioritizes the granting of rehabilitation rights over prison sentences.
COUNTERING TERRORISM CRIMES THROUGH SOFT APPROACHES AND HARD APPROACHES THAT OCCUR IN THE ACEH REGION Zulfahmi Zulfahmi; Mukidi Mukidi; Panca Sarjana Putra
Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Edisi Januari 2025
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/metadata.v7i1.978

Abstract

Terrorism is a type of crime that cannot be classified as an ordinary crime. The development of former terrorism prisoners, or what is often called former terrorism convicts (ex-prisoners), is a systematic effort to return them to society. This includes rehabilitation, social reintegration, and deradicalization to prevent them from being exposed to radical ideas and committing acts of terrorism. The development of former terrorism prisoners, or what is often called former terrorism convicts (ex-prisoners), is a systematic effort to return them to society. This includes rehabilitation, social reintegration, and deradicalization to prevent them from being exposed to radical ideas and committing acts of terrorism.
Co-Authors Adil Akhyar Andria Hariza Nugraha Danial Syah Fadhil Fahreza Mukidi Mukidi Mustamam Mustamam Rahmad Romy Agustiando Tampubolon Tajuddin Noor Zaizil Ihza Mahendra Zulfahmi Zulfahmi