Mustamam Mustamam
Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara Medan

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA MELALUI FUNGSI ASESMEN DALAM UPAYA PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN NARKOTIKA (Studi Di Kepolisian Sektor Aceh Selatan) Mustamam Mustamam; Hefi Bachri; Mukidi Mukidi
Jurnal Meta Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Edisi Juli 2023
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/jmh.v2i2.425

Abstract

Wajib lapor pecandu narkotika sebagai sebuah upaya untuk memenuhi hak pecandu narkotika dalam mendapatkan pengobatan atau perawatan melalui rehabilitasi medis dan rehabilitasi sosial. Pengaturan hukum asesmen dalam upaya penyelesaian tindak pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika bagi diri sendiri diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika dan berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 25 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pelaksanaan Wajib Lapor Pecandu Narkotika. Mekanisme assesmen terpadu dalam penyelesaian kasus penyalahgunaan narkotika pecandu narkotika yang sudah cukup umur atau keluarganya atau orang tua atau wali dari pecandu narkotika yang belum cukup umur kepada institusi penerima wajib lapor untuk mendapatkan pengobatan atau perawatan melalui rehabilitasi medis dan rehabilitasi sosial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Hambatan asesmen dalam upaya penyelesaian tindak pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika bagi dirsi sendiri di antaranya, Kontradiksi pengaturan Pasal tentang rehabilitasi. Upaya mengatasi hambatan adalah diperlukannya peninjauan kembali regulasi yang sekiranya memberatkan pelaksanaan program terutama mengenai waktu maksimal pengajuan permohonan asesmen terpadu oleh penyidik
THE ROLE OF THE POLICE IN ERADICATING ILLEGAL LEVIES IN THE ISSUANCE OF DRIVER'S LICENSES IN THE JURISDICTION OF THE MEDAN POLICE Andi Muhammad Arif Pulungan; Mustamam Mustamam; Cut Nurita
Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Edition January 2026
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/metadata.v8i1.958

Abstract

Illegal levies are criminal acts regulated in various legal provisions, especially related to corruption and extortion. Based on the results of the study, it is known that law enforcement against illegal levy perpetrators in the issuance of Driver's Licenses in the jurisdiction of the Medan Police involves various efforts, ranging from prevention to enforcement. Preventive efforts such as the inclusion of anti-pungli pledges, strict supervision, and the development of a code of ethics are very important. In addition, strict action against the perpetrators of fraud, including police members, is also needed. The public can also play a role in reporting pungli through the application. Obstacles to overcoming illegal levies in the issuance of driver's licenses in the jurisdiction of the Medan Police are the lack of public awareness, difficult proof, and lack of public participation in reporting pungli. Efforts to counter it include prevention through education and socialization, strengthening the role of the Saber Pungli Task Force, and strict law enforcement.
CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY OF PERPETRATORS OF THE CRIMINAL ACTS HOARDING OF SUBSIDIZED FUEL OIL (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 4/PID.SUS/2025/PN SGI) Emi Fajri; Mustamam Mustamam; Cut Nurita
Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Edition January 2026
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/metadata.v8i1.959

Abstract

Fuel hoarding is the activity of illegally hoarding or storing Fuel Oil in large quantities, usually to be resold at a higher price when there is a scarcity. This hoarding often targets subsidized fuel, which has a detrimental impact on the community and burdens the state's finances. The responsibility of the perpetrators of the crime of hoarding subsidized fuel oil in the Sigli District Court Decision Number 4/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Sgi the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 8 (four) months and a fine of Rp5,000,000.00 (five million rupiah), with the provision that if the fine is not paid, it will be replaced with imprisonment for 1 (one) month. The judge's consideration is because there is no justification and forgiveness, so that he is found guilty, as well as aggravating and mitigating matters. The mitigating factor for the defendant has never been punished while the aggravating factor is that the defendant's actions are detrimental to subsidized fuel consumers
THE AUTHORITY OF POLICE INVESTIGATORS IN REVEALING CORRUPTION (STUDY AT THE BINJAI RESORT POLICE) Herio Simanjuntak; Mustamam Mustamam; Indra Gunawan Purba
Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Edition January 2026
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/metadata.v8i1.963

Abstract

Police investigators have the authority to uncover corruption crimes, in accordance with Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and other laws and regulations. This authority includes investigations and investigations, as well as other actions necessary in legal proceedings. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the obstacles for police investigators in uncovering corruption crimes are both internal and external aspects. Some of the internal obstacles include limited human resources, suboptimal legal understanding, and lack of coordination between agencies. Meanwhile, external barriers include political pressure, lack of public support, and obstacles in the collection of evidence.
SETTLEMENT OF CORRUPTION CONNECTION CASES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF GENERAL CRIMINAL AND MILITARY CRIMES Irwansyah Irwansyah; Mustamam Mustamam; Cut Nurita
Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Edition January 2026
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/metadata.v8i1.964

Abstract

Corruption can be committed by any community. It is possible to do so by members of the TNI together with civilians, who must be formally tried legally in the connectivity court. Based on the research, it can be concluded that the mechanism for handling connectivity cases in corruption cases is specifically for the investigation of connectivity cases, carried out by the Connectivity Investigation Permanent Team as stipulated in Article 89 of the Criminal Procedure Code and article 198 paragraph (2) of Law Number 31 of 1997 concerning Military Justice, namely general judicial investigators as referred to in article 6 of the Criminal Procedure Code, consisting of State Police Officials of the Republic of Indonesia, and certain Civil Servant Officials (PPNS) who are given special authority by law, Military Police and Military Inspectors or High Military Inspectors. The obstacle to resolving corruption crimes through the connectivity court is too complicated and long a procedure because the formation of a connection case investigation team was formed based on a joint decree between the TNI Commander and the Supreme Court. In addition, the Supreme Court and the Minister of Defense must also reciprocally propose the appointment of member judges who will handle connectivity cases.
LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE CHILDREN INVOLVED NARCOTICS ABUSE CRIMES IN THE JURISDICTION OF SABANG CITY Zaizil Ihza Mahendra; Mustamam Mustamam; Panca Sarjana Putra
Jurnal Ilmiah METADATA Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Edisi Januari 2025
Publisher : LPPM YPITI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47652/metadata.v7i1.976

Abstract

Legal protection for drug users, according to Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, is provided through medical and social rehabilitation for addicts and victims of abuse. Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection provides special protection for children as drug users, which also views children as both victims and perpetrators. Therefore, priority is given to supervision, treatment, and rehabilitation, rather than just criminalization. Legal provisions for children in conflict with the law are in accordance with Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Legal accountability for children who use narcotics uses a juvenile criminal justice system that prioritizes action and rehabilitation, not just criminal penalties, with a maximum penalty of half the adult penalty. Children are considered both perpetrators and victims, so that in addition to criminal sanctions, judges can also impose rehabilitation and guidance measures to restore children and prevent them from abusing drugs again, in accordance with the Narcotics Law and the Child Protection Law. Legal protection for children as perpetrators of narcotics crimes, if the child is a perpetrator of narcotics abuse, prioritizes the granting of rehabilitation rights over prison sentences.