Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

Gender Justice Principles in the Islamic Inheritance System Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie; Rahadyan Widarsadhika Wisnumurti; Dedy Muharman
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): Agustus 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v17i2.11022

Abstract

This study aims to examine the principles of gender justice within the Islamic inheritance system, based on Surah An-Nisa’ verses 11-12, which stipulate a 2:1 ratio (a male receives two shares of the inheritance compared to a female). However, in the modern era, with changing times and human mindsets, as well as demands for equal rights, this 2:1 stipulation is considered a problem of justice. This research is normative juridical research, employing the library research method. The legal materials used include literature studies, such as interpretations of sacred texts, fiqh books, books, journals, previous research results, websites, and other writings related to the issues being studied. The results of this research indicate that justice refers to fair and equal treatment for every individual in accordance with the principles of the Qur'an and Hadith. However, in the context of Islamic inheritance distribution, challenges arise due to social and cultural changes that affect its interpretation and application. Although the principles of justice remain, there needs to be a renewal in the interpretation and implementation of Islamic law to reflect social and economic developments and to advocate for gender equality. This adaptation is not an effort to oppose culture or religion but a step towards a more just society for all individuals, regardless of gender. In making this adaptation, religious values and cultural traditions must be reinterpreted in accordance with the spirit of inclusivity and justice inherent in Islam, so that Islam remains a relevant moral and legal guide for its followers.
Revisiting Justice in Inclusive Education: A Case Study of Jombang Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie; Tina Fitria Ningtyas; Nata Senora; M. Ja'far Raihan Alfath; Maulana Berlian
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): Agustus 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v18i2.131786

Abstract

Inclusive education has become a fundamental principle within the Indonesian education system as an effort to ensure equal rights for all children, including those with special needs. However, the implementation of inclusive education policies at the regional level, particularly in Jombang Regency, reveals a gap between normative discourse and the reality of practice on the ground. The Jombang Regent Regulation No. 39 of 2014 serves as the legal basis for the implementation of inclusive education; however, its application does not fully reflect the principle of substantive justice for children with special needs. This study aims to critique the policy using philosophical and normative approaches to analyze the role of the state as the organizer of inclusive education. The methodology employed is a qualitative approach with textual analysis of legislation and observation of policy implementation in inclusive schools in Jombang. The research findings indicate that although inclusive education policies are legally and formally regulated, many deficiencies persist in practice, such as the lack of support teachers, unprepared curricula, and insufficient funding. These findings reflect the state's failure to uphold the principles of social justice and human rights for children with special needs. Inclusive education should be understood as an integral part of the state's obligation to achieve substantive justice, rather than merely an administrative requirement.
Dampak Pengangkatan Anggota TNI Aktif Sebagai Pejabat Kepala Daerah Terhadap Tatakelola Pemerintah Ganis Khoirun Nisa; Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1724

Abstract

Regional head officials are people chosen to carry out duties and authority, both at the provincial and city district levels. The appointment of regional head officials is usually chosen by the central goverment throught the president or minister of home affairs to fill vacancies due to the end of their term of office or if the previous official has died. According to law number 10 of 2016 concerning regional elections, the appointment of regional head officials is carried out through an election process by the community. However, in the event of a vacancy, the minister of home affairs has the right to appoint a temporary official to replace the position of the previous official. The filling in of regional head officials refers to artickel 86 of 2014 concerning regional government. The filling of regional haead officials do not go through a direct election mechanism by the people. This causes political domination and pasrty influence in making decisions. In relation to the decision of the minister of home affairs number 4 of 2023 regarding the appointment of regional head officials from active TNI members which if felt to have caused a lot of controversy which is contrary to the TNI Law. The aim of this research is to find out about the appointment af regional head officials according to the government of the minister of home affairs number 4 of 2023. The method used in this writing is normative by taking a case, conceptual and statutory approach. The result and discussion obtained were a legal review of the mechanism for regional head officials according to minister of home affairs regulation number 4 of 2023 article 3 paragraph (b) with the TNI Law article 47 paragraph (1) which contradicts and creates conflicting norms regarding the appointment of public officials from the military.
Analisis Komparatif Konversi dan Kontradisi Normatif Antara Jaminan Hak Berpendapat Pasal 28E Ayat 3 dan Perlindungan Privasi Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 dalam Hukum Konstitusi Indonesia Sansabila Ivana Putri; Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1781

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami secara mendalam tentang pengaturan mengenai perlindungan hak atas privasi sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang No.39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia, serta untuk mengkaji hubungan, , batasan dan titik keseimbangan antara hak kebebasan berpendapat sebagaimana yang tercantum dalam Pasal 28E UUD 1945 dengan hak perlindungan privasi dalam sistem hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Permasalahan penelitian ini berangkat dari munculnya ketegangan antara kebebasan berekspresi di ranah digital yang dijamin oleh konstitusi dan upaya perlindungan terhadap hak privasi individu, terutama dalam penerapan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Fenomena tersebut memperlihatkan potensi konflik dan tidak jelasnya batas antara kedua hak yang sering kali menimbulkan pembatasan terhadap kebebasan berpendapat atau penyalahgunaan data pribadi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan serta pendekatan konseptual. Analisis bahan hukum dolakukan secara preskriptif normatif untuk merumuskan pandangan dan rekomendasi yang sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia. Hasil yang diharapkan adalah konstruksi hukum yang aplikatif dan proposional untuk menyeimbangi kebebasan berpendapat dan perlindungan privasi, dengan meninjau kembali yang ada agar tidak menghambat hak dasar setiap warga negara.Kebebasan Berpendapat, Perlindungan Privasi, Hak Asasi Manusia, dan Undang-Undang No. 39 Tahun 1999
Socio Legal Perspectives on Law Enforcement Discretion in Resolving Minor Offense Cases Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie; Ari Purwadi; M. Yasin; Randy Vallentino Neonbeni
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026)
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/ijerlas.v6i5.5331

Abstract

The handling of minor offenses is at the intersection between the demands of formal legality and the need for substantive justice at the community level. In this context, the discretion of law enforcement officials is an important instrument to prevent over-criminalization, reduce the burden on the justice system, and open up more restorative resolution space. However, the absence of firm normative boundaries and weak accountability mechanisms make discretion vulnerable to social bias, disparity in treatment, and the reproduction of power imbalances. This study aims to analyze discretionary practices in resolving minor offense cases through a socio-legal perspective that places law as a social practice influenced by cultural, political, and power relations structures. Using a socio-legal approach, this study combines a normative analysis of the legal framework that governs discretion with empirical studies through in-depth interviews and observations of law enforcement practices at the field level. The findings of the study suggest that discretion contributes significantly to the effectiveness of the justice system and the restoration of social relations, but at the same time creates a space for power negotiation that has the potential to erode the principle of equality before the law. The inconsistency of the standard of application and the dominance of the subjective considerations of the apparatus show that discretion is not just a technical instrument, but a social arena full of values and interests. Therefore, this study emphasizes the urgency of establishing human rights-based operational guidelines, strengthening participatory oversight systems, and integrating restorative justice principles in law enforcement policies, in order to ensure that discretion functions as a means of social justice, not a source of legal uncertainty.
Penyuluhan Hukum Waris untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Masyarakat di Kelurahan Wonorejo, Kota Surabaya Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie; Muh Jufri Ahmad; I Gde Daniel Rafael Putra Djatimulia; Hertikawati Sihotang
Jurnal Penyuluhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Penyuluhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jppm.v4i1.1033

Abstract

Pembagian harta warisan sering menjadi sumber sengketa dalam keluarga, terutama karena ketidaktahuan mengenai ketentuan hukum yang berlaku. Di Indonesia, hukum yang mengatur pembagian warisan terdapat dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata) Pasal 830-1130 dan Undang-Undang No. 3 Tahun 2006 yang mengatur pembagian warisan dalam konteks hukum waris Islam. Masalah hukum waris ini sering kali menimbulkan konflik berkelanjutan yang melibatkan berbagai pihak, mulai dari pejabat daerah, notaris, hingga pengadilan. Oleh karena itu, penting untuk memberikan pemahaman yang benar kepada masyarakat mengenai pembagian harta warisan yang sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum. Kegiatan penyuluhan hukum waris di Kelurahan Wonorejo ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman masyarakat tentang pembagian harta warisan yang sah, baik menurut KUHPerdata maupun hukum waris Islam. Dengan adanya sosialisasi ini, diharapkan masyarakat tidak lagi bingung atau buta hukum terkait pembagian warisan, serta dapat menyelesaikan sengketa warisan melalui musyawarah kekeluargaan sebelum melibatkan jalur hukum formal.
Recognizing Living Ecological Law: Islamic Environmental Ethics and Eco-Fishing Governance in Giligenting, Indonesia Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie; Rosalinda Elsina Latumahina; Anggit Wasesa Praja; Hendry Dapot Maringan H.M; Ahmad Firza Al Farizi
IURIS NOTITIA : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Oktober 2026
Publisher : Ninety Media Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69916/iuris.v4i2.707

Abstract

This study aims to analyze ecological wisdom and Islamic ethics in the eco-fishing practices of the Giligenting community and their recognition through an environmentally oriented Village Regulation to strengthen the implementation of Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation No. 36 of 2023. The study focuses on fishing communities in the Giligenting Islands, Sumenep, where ecological norms are rooted in lived experience, intergenerational knowledge, social agreements, and religious values, yet face destructive fishing practices by some external actors. This study employs a qualitative socio-legal design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with fishers, religious leaders, community leaders, former village officials, and community members, supplemented by participant observation and legal document analysis. The data were analyzed thematically and integrated with legal analysis and Islamic environmental ethics. The findings reveal that ecological wisdom, social control, and the Islamic values of trust (amanah), benefit and harm (maslahah–mafsadah), and the prohibition of environmental destruction (fasad) constitute a living ecological law that is effective within the community but has limited binding force over external actors. A Village Regulation is therefore needed not to create new ecological norms, but to recognize and connect existing community norms with formal law. This study proposes the concept of a recognition-based regulatory bridge as a framework for strengthening community-based sustainable fisheries governance.