Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin
Oktaviana Nirmala Purba
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Singaraja, Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Beyond Remembering: Assessment and Evaluation of Middle School Mathematics Learning within the Framework of Bloom's Taxonomy Oktaviana Nirmala Purba; I Gede Ratnaya; I Dewa Ayu Made Budhyani; I Gusti Lanang Agung Partawa
ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 7 (2026): ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisplin, July 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/armada.v4i7.3203

Abstract

Mathematics assessment in junior secondary schools should respond to students’ diverse cognitive attainment across Bloom’s Taxonomy, from C1 to C6. However, studies indicate that assessment instruments in textbooks, exercises, daily tests, and end-of-semester examinations remain dominated by C1–C3 questions and inadequately support higher-order thinking skills. This article examines the alignment of mathematics assessment practices with the responsiveness principles of Bloom’s Taxonomy. The study employed a qualitative approach using secondary data and a critical qualitative review design. Data came from articles, research reports, and review documents indexed in Google Scholar, ERIC, and arXiv, and were analysed thematically and critically. The findings reveal a gap between HOTS-oriented curriculum expectations and the cognitive distribution of questions. In one Year 7 mathematics textbook, C2 questions accounted for 75.2%, whereas C6 questions represented only 0.4%. These findings highlight the need for more balanced, adaptive, and responsive mathematics assessments that accommodate variations in students’ thinking abilities.
Co-Authors I Dewa Ayu Made Budhyani I Gede Ratnaya I Gusti Lanang Agung Partawa