Satriadi
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bone

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Restructuring Electoral Cycles: Remedial Calibration and Legislative Discretion in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024 Satriadi; Lisma Lisma; Lukman Ansar; Tarmizi; Sabar Podu; Wira Kafryawan; David Aprizon Putra
Constitutional Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : IAIN Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/clr.v5i1.6029

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision No. 135/PUU-XXII/2024 restructures Indonesia’s electoral system by separating national and subnational elections and prescribing an interval of between two and two and a half years. This article evaluates the constitutional legitimacy of that intervention through doctrinal constitutional research and functional comparison. It develops a two-level framework distinguishing structural justification from remedial calibration. The analysis finds that the Court had a defensible constitutional basis for separating the two electoral cycles, given concerns relating to popular sovereignty, electoral quality, institutional capacity, political recruitment, and legislative inertia. However, the judgment provides a weaker constitutional and evidential basis for prescribing the precise temporal interval. It does not sufficiently explain why the selected minimum and maximum periods were necessary or why less intrusive remedies preserving greater legislative discretion would have been inadequate. The article argues that open legal policy neither immunises electoral legislation from review nor permits complete judicial displacement of legislative choice. Legitimate constitutional remedies must remain proportionate, evidence-based, and attentive to institutional competence.
Reconstruction of the Authority of the Papuan People's Assembly Based on the Principles of Siyasah Syar'iyyah: A Study of the Function of Cultural Representation Lukman Ansar; Sabar Podu; Lisma; Satriadi; Zulfadli; Dandi Wahyudin; Andi Miftahul Maulidil Mursyid
Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam Vol.11 No.1 (2026)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam IAIN Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/ajmpi.v11i1.10900

Abstract

This article examines the structural limitation of authority exercised by the Papuan People’s Assembly (Majelis Rakyat Papua -MRP), a cultural representative institution established under Indonesia’s Special Autonomy framework. Despite its strong moral and cultural legitimacy to protect the identity and fundamental rights of Indigenous Papuans, MRP’s authority remains largely procedural, creating a persistent gap between its normative mandate and practical influence in regional governance. Existing studies tend to frame this limitation as an administrative or political issue, leaving its normative and theoretical dimensions underexplored. This study offers a conceptual reconstruction of MRP’s authority through the lens of Siyasah Syar’iyyah, employed as a normative governance framework rather than a merely ethical reference. Using a normative juridical method that integrates conceptual, statutory, and historical approaches, the research develops a prescriptive model grounded in the principles of al-maslahah (public welfare), al-‘adl (justice), and hifz al-‘ird (protection of dignity). The findings demonstrate that this framework enables a redefinition of MRP from a symbolic cultural body into a substantive guardian of Indigenous interests with strengthened consultative authority possessing normative effects. The article contributes by bridging Islamic political jurisprudence and indigenous governance, while offering a normative-institutional basis for enhancing cultural justice within Papua’s Special Autonomy system.