Palahudin
Universitas Djuanda, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Effect of Compensation and Work Discipline on Work Productivity through Job Satisfaction Samsuri; Lia Kian; Palahudin
Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): JIMKES Edisi January 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kesatuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37641/jimkes.v14i1.4758

Abstract

The tea plantation industry in Indonesia faces ongoing challenges in sustaining employee productivity due to cost pressures, competitive demands, and difficulties in implementing effective human resource management practices, where the combined effects of compensation and work discipline, particularly mediated by job satisfaction, remain underexplored. This study aims to examine the direct and indirect influences of compensation and work discipline on work productivity, with job satisfaction serving as an intervening variable, among employees. The research adopted a quantitative approach using path analysis. Data were collected from 100 purposively selected employees through questionnaires measured on a five-point Likert scale. Analysis was conducted with statistical software to test direct effects, indirect effects via the Sobel test, and total effects. The results indicate that compensation and work discipline significantly and positively affect job satisfaction, with compensation showing a stronger influence. Both variables also directly enhance work productivity, again with compensation exerting a greater impact. Job satisfaction partially mediates these relationships, contributing meaningful indirect effects. Compensation demonstrates a substantially larger total effect on work productivity compared to work discipline, highlighting the need for management to prioritize competitive compensation and disciplined work practices to boost employee productivity.
Beyond Financial Accountability: Deconstructing Accountability through the Values of Tunjuk Ajar Melayu Resti Amelia Kholifah; Erny Amriani Asmin; Palahudin
JURNAL ECONOMINA Vol. 5 No. 10 (2026): JURNAL ECONOMINA, Oktober 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/economina.v5i10.4468

Abstract

This study deconstructs the dominant conception of modern accountability through a single ethical value, amanah, as articulated in Tunjuk Ajar Melayu by Tenas Effendy. Modern accountability is often operationalized through formal reporting, compliance, audit, and measurable performance, which can privilege external control and financial or administrative visibility over the moral, relational, and transcendental dimensions of responsibility. The study employs a postmodern paradigm and an interpretive qualitative approach, using Jacques Derrida’s deconstructive reading as its analytical lens. The primary source is the corpus of petuah, pantun, syair, and ungkapan concerning amanah within Tunjuk Ajar Melayu, complemented by scholarly literature on accountability, postmodernism, indigenous accounting, and Malay ethics. The analysis proceeds by tracing the internal structure of amanah itself, examining the binary oppositions embedded in dominant accountability discourse, and re- signifying accountability from within amanah’s own textual field. The findings show that amanah alone carries a transcendental dimension linking responsibility to faith and the Hereafter, a moral-personal dimension grounded in honesty and steadfastness, a social-relational dimension tied to marwah and communal trust, a custodial dimension concerning the safekeeping of what is entrusted, and a consequential-normative dimension in which betrayal of trust is understood to bring social and moral ruin. Together these dimensions extend accountability beyond formal compliance and financial measurement toward a substantive, moral, relational, and transcendental conception grounded entirely in one indigenous value. Rather than claiming a single universal form of Malay accountability, the study presents amanah, as articulated in Tunjuk Ajar Melayu, as a self-sufficient epistemic resource for rethinking accountability in accounting research.